Answer:
Even though this question is missing the options, after analyzing the revision we can safely say it was made for <u>conciseness</u>.
Explanation:
Conciseness can be simply defined as saying a lot in just a few words. Notice how the original paragraph is much longer than the revised one. The writer gave much more information than what was truly necessary. Details such as "and that new procedures need to be initiated" and "who was sympathetic" are superfluous. The first one adds nothing of value. If the procedures are inadequate, it is quite obvious that new ones need to be initiated. Readers could infer that. The second one is permeated with subjectivity, not only making the paragraph longer, but also stating an opinion that in uncalled for in this context. By eliminating the extra words, the writer made the paragraph concise, using fewer words to express the necessary.
Answer:
It is third person point of view.
Explanation:
The narrator refers to the main character, Marvin, using the pronoun "he." This makes it a third-person point of view.
<h2>Answer:</h2>
Humans destroy beauty
<h2>Explanation:</h2>
Humans are selfish in nature and they are always self-centered. Everything that is essential for them is destroyed by them for their own benefits. The same idea is described by the poet here. He says that honeysuckle is a beautiful flower but since it is sweet in nature and it is edible so humans would not look at its beauty rather they would try to eat it too and destroy this beauty of nature.
Answer:
The subject and predicate make up the two basic structural parts of any complete sentence.
Explanation:
Answer:Information being disguarded
Explanation: to many people the info has to go through
