A <u>double-blind experiment </u>allows researchers to identify the specific effects of the independent variable from the possible effects of the experimenter's and the participants' expectations about it.
<u>Explanation</u>:
The double-blind experiment is conducted to ensure that the results of the experiments are not biased. The double-blind study states that the person who is implementing the experiment and the person involved in the experiment are not aware of each other. So there will be no bias in the experimental treatment.
The reliability in the double-blind experiment is improved. Under this experiment unintentional tipping off the study participants and biasing of the evaluation results by the researchers can be avoided.
The effects of using steroids are <u>"acne, mood swings, masculine traits in women, and feminine traits in men."</u>
Steroids are synthetic drugs that duplicate the masculinising impacts of the male sex hormone, testosterone.
Typical male and female clients incorporate proficient competitors, muscle heads and individuals who feel they have to look solid to like themselves.
Symptoms can incorporate liver illness, harm to the reproductive organs and serious emotional episodes.
Support is accessible for steroid clients who need to change their reliance on these medications.
Steroids work by impersonating the properties of normally happening hormones. Muscle tissue is peppered with receptor locales particular to development.
c. examining two primary options and their trade-offs before making a decision
Please include the following or I can’t answer
In a social program, systematic methods are the resources needed for the program to operate, while evaluations are tangible results of the program process.
<h3>Which kind of methods is commonly used in process evaluations?</h3>
Process evaluation usually uses both quantitative and qualitative methods, that may include structured observations, questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, focus groups and logs.
The four basic kind of evaluation: clinical reviews, clinical trials, program reviews, and program trials. A systematic method for collecting, analyzing, and utilizing data to check the effectiveness and efficiency of programs and, as important, to contribute to continuous program improvement.
Evaluation offers the information necessary to check how well a program or initiative is being implemented and know whether that program is achieving desired results.
To know more about process evaluations visit the link
brainly.com/question/14084377
#SPJ4
