Answer:
(x - 8)² + (y + 6)² = 25
Step-by-step explanation:
The equation of a circle in standard form is
(x - h)² + (y - k)² = r²
where (h, k ) are the coordinates of the centre and r is the radius
Here (h, k ) = (8, - 6 ) , then
(x - 8)² + (y - (- 6))² = r² , that is
(x - 8)² + (y + 6)² = r²
The radius is the distance from the centre to a point on the circle
Calculate r using the distance formula
r = 
with (x₁, y₁ ) = (8, - 6 ) and (x₂, y₂ ) = (5, - 2 )
r = 
= 
= 
= 
= 
= 5
Then equation of circle is
(x - 8)² + (y + 6)² = 5² , that is
(x - 8)² + (y + 6)² = 25
Answer:
m(-1)^n - 1
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
<PCH+<HCK=180-DEGREE BEING IN A STRAIGHT LINE.
3M+58+8M+155=180
11M=180-213
11M=-33
M=-3
SO,
<PCH
3M+58
=3*(-3)+58
=58-9
=49-DEGREE
The coordinates of the 2 given points are W(-5, 2), and X(5, -4).
First, we find the midpoint M using the midpoint formula:
Nex, we find the slope of the line containing M, perpendicular to WX. We know that if
m and
n are the slopes of 2 parallel lines, then
mn=-1.
The slope of WX is
.
Thus, the slope n of the perpendicular line is
.
The equation of the line with slope
containing the point M(0, -1) is given by:
Answer: 5x-3y-3=0
Answer:
The p value for this case would be given by:
For this case the p value is lower than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis so then we can conclude that the true proportion is significantly higher than 0.42
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
n=1045 represent the random sample selected
X=502 represent the college graduates with a mentor
estimated proportion of college graduates with a mentor
is the value that we want to test
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Hypothesis to test
We want to test if the true proportion is higher than 0.42, the system of hypothesis are.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic is given by:
(1)
Replacing the info we got:
The p value for this case would be given by:
For this case the p value is lower than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis so then we can conclude that the true proportion is significantly higher than 0.42
