You subtrscy the bigger number (2010's population) by the smaller one (1910's population). 237194-608660= 371,466.
When you round to the 100's you check the 10's place. If 5 or higher add a 1 to the hundreds place, and make the 1's and 10's place 0. If lower don't add anything and make the 1's and 10's place into 0s.
When you round it, you will get 371,400
The answer is A, you can tell because if you multiply 4 by the numbers inside the parentheses you’ll get =12+24..hope that helped :)
Answer:
look at the graph i made with desmos, i just plugged the equation in.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The record of the statistics and the summary statistics which are the missing files in the question are attached below.
From the given information:
The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis can be represented by :
There is no difference between the average time spend by men and women at gym each week
The average time spend by men is greater than the average time spend by women at the gym each week
From the summary statistics in the attached file below:
The p-value = 0.3253
Level of significance = 5% = 0.05
Therefore; it is obvious that the p-value is greater than the level of significance i.e (0.3253 > 0.05)
Hence; there is no enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis
CONCLUSION: We conclude that the mean number of minutes exercised per week is larger for men than women at the this gym.