2. Which historical development illustrates the fulfillment of Winthrops

History

1 answer:

likoan [24]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The historical development which illustrates the fulfillment of Winthrop's argument is:

(A) Polk negotiated a compromise with the British over Oregon.

Explanation:

Between 1859 and 1872, Great Britain and the US fought a bitter war for the control of Oregon. This war was caused by a stray pig; no wonder, the US termed it: "the Pig War." Earlier John Winthrop had argued that the United States, the New England, was to become "a city on a hill," very conspicuous to all men. Possession of the new land signaled an alliance with the word of God. Failure to uphold the human part of the covenant would expose the country to ridicule. President Polk, fighting the Pig War with Great Britain over Oregon without victory, was a sign of failure to uphold the covenant. The country was exposed to public ridicule because the war only ended with the signing of a treaty (a form of compromise), which ceded the whole of Vancouver to Britain and then Oregon to the US.

You might be interested in

BRAINLIESTTT ASAP! PLEASE HELP ME :)

dem82 [27]

Answer:

World war 1 began in 1914 after the assassination of archduke Franz Ferdinand, the war ended in 1918. During the war Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria and the Ottoman Empire fall against Great Britain, France, Russia, Italy, Romania, Japan and the United State. mainly Britain, France, and US won World War 1 Germany was the main Loser along with Australia- Hungary , the Ottoman Empire, and the other Central Powers and also Russia although Russia withdrew from the war early due to Civil War issues at home. Germany had formally surrendered on November 11th in 1918 and All Nations had agreed to stop fighting while the terms of Peace were negotiated . on June 28th 1919 Germany and the Allied Nations including Britain, France, Italy and Russia signed the Treaty of Versallies, formerly ending the war.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

He wrote the proposed Bill of rights that would be added to the constitution

TEA [102]

Answer:

It was James Madison (the 4th president of the USA)

Explanation:

He wrote the Bill of Rights for the constitution! (Sorry if wrong!)

8 0

3 years ago

What year was napoleon born?

neonofarm [45]

Answer:

Napoleon Bonaparte:

Date of birth : August 15, 1769

3 0

3 years ago

Give at least two reasons why the Articles of Confederation were inadequate to meet the needs of the time

sashaice [31]

The articles created a very losely based country that would not survie
also the states were in full control and they would not pay the federal goverment taxes which would have left the goverment broke

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is justice black's purpose in noting that the father of four armband wearers is "a methodist minister without a church" who

s344n2d4d5 [400]

Answer:

The answer is First Amendment rights, connected in light of the extraordinary qualities of the school condition, are accessible to educators and understudies. It can barely be contended that either understudies or instructors shed their established rights to the right to speak freely or articulation at the school building entryway.

Explanation:

This has been the indisputable holding of this Court for right around 50 years. In Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923), and Barrels v. Iowa, 262 U.S. 404 (1923), this Court, in sentiments by Mr. Equity Reynolds, held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment keeps States from disallowing the instructing of a remote dialect to youthful understudies. Rules to this impact, the Court held, illegally meddle with the freedom of educator, understudy, and parent. [note 2] See additionally Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 [507] (1925); West Virginia v. Barnett, 319 U.S. 624 (1943); McConnell v. Leading group of Education, 333 U.S. 203 (1948); Wieman v. Updegraff, 344 U.S. 183, 195 (1952) (agreeing feeling); Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 (1957); Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479, 487 (1960); Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962); Keyishian v. Leading group of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 603 (1967); Epperson v. Arkansas, stake, p. 97 (1968).

5 0

3 years ago