Explanation:
The Fair Debt Collection Practices act protects the credit card users from the deceptive or incorrect practices when debt is collected.
Answer:
The incomplete part of the question is "Using a cap-and-trade system of tradable emission allowances will eliminate half of the sulfur dioxide pollution at a cost of $1 million per year. If the permits are not tradable, what will be the cost of eliminating half of the pollution? If permits cannot be traded, then the cost of the pollution reduction will be $1 million per year." The full question is attched as picture as well
1) Tradable permit system
Then lower MAC firm will abate the all pollution units
Then as MAC1 = $250, MAC2 = $275
Firm 1 = Consolidated electric
Firm 2 = Commonwealth utility
Then 1 will sell all permits to 2, at a price between $250 & $275.
So total cost of abatement of 20 units = MAC1 * 20
= $250 * 20 Unit
= $5,000
2) Non-tradable permits
Total cost = MC1*10 + MC2*10
= $2,500 + $2,750
= $5,250
The answer is 20%, 40 is 1/5 of 200, therefore it is 20%
Answer: $1600
Explanation:
From the information given, it can be noted that while Ryan is vested, on the other hand, Todd isn't vested.
Therefore, since the vacation is for two weeks, the amount of vacation expense and liability should be reported will be for Ryan alone and this will be:
= $800 × 2
= $1600
In this case, service has already been rendered ans there's accumulated rights, therefore a vacation expense and liability of $1600 should be reported.