Options:
A. Because Heather violated the contract to provide a full blooded Pomeranian, Brad is entitled to rescind the contract and also to the damages he seeks.
B. Because Heather violated the contract to provide a full blooded Pomeranian, Brad is entitled to rescind the contract, but he is not entitled to the damages he seeks.
C. Because Heather is not guilty of any wrongdoing, Brad is entitled to no remedy; and Heather has an additional 30 days in order to honor the contract.
D. Because Heather is not guilty of any wrongdoing, Brad is entitled to no remedy; and Heather has an additional 60 days in order to honor the contract.
E. Because Heather is not guilty of any wrongdoing, Brad is entitled to no remedy; and Heather has an additional 90 days in order to honor the contract
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Heather's misrepresentation resulted in her breaching the contract, even if she did it innocently or not. But since no transaction was completed, then the contract is simply terminated. If Brad had realized Heather's mistake after he had paid for the dog, then he could argue that he suffered damages and could try to seek some type of compensation but that wasn't the case here.
The true answer is a master's degree.
The excess of cost over the sales price of treasury stock should be debited to loss from the Sale of Treasury Stock.
Formerly outstanding stock that has been repurchased and is now retained by the issuing business is known as treasury stock.
Treasury stock is a counter equity account since it lowers the overall shareholders' equity on a company's balance sheet.
The two ways for recording Treasury stock are the cost method and the par value approach.
Since the cost of the treasury is greater than the selling price of the stock.
This results in a loss on the sale of treasury stock.
Therefore, the loss is accounted for by debiting in accounting.
Hence, The excess of cost over the sales price of treasury stock should be debited to loss from the Sale of Treasury Stock.
Learn more about treasury bond:
brainly.com/question/13984173
#SPJ1
The irrational number is the square root of 3. (option 3).
<h3>What is the irrational number?</h3>
An irrational number is a number that cannot be expressed as the quotient of two integers. On the other hand, a rational number is a number that can be expressed as a fraction of two integers
The square root of 3 is an irrational number because it cannot be expressed as the quotient of two numbers. The square root of 3 is also known as the Theodorus' constant. It is named after Theodorus of Cyrene the person who proved its an irrational number.
The square root of 49 and 23 are rational numbers because they can be expressed as the quotient of 7 and 11.5 respectively.
To learn more about rational numbers, please check: brainly.com/question/20435423
#SPJ1
Answer:
The spirit of personal irritation is associate intervention with the utilization and pleasure of land. So long because the intervention is considerable and unreasoning, and love would be aggressive or problematic to the conventional individual, nearly any disruption to the satisfaction of property could quantity to a nuisance.