Answer: b. it's profitable in the short run for another member to increase production.
Explanation:
This refers to an oligopolistic market where there are few producers of a good. These producers can come together to create a cartel that fixes prices for the goods and services they produce.
If they agree to cut back production, this will have the effect of increasing prices due to a reduction in supply. If a member decides to increase production, they would enjoy profits in the short term from the increased prices.
The other members would however respond by increasing production as well so those profits would stop towards the long run.
Answer:
North Korea - Command Economy.
Explanation:
In Command Economy, the government control all means of production. The citizens have no power to actually make efforts to own these resources.
To proof it, we can refer to the economic freedom ranking that was created by Heritage Foundation. From all 180 countries included in the ranking, north Korea placed at the very bottom.
The Government of North Korea have total control of the economy. They determine what products should be made, what type of jobs the citizens can held, and how those resources should be distributed among the people.
Answer: Social comparison
Explanation:
The social comparison is one of the important theory in the society which state that the individual person can determine their own personal and the social importance by comparing their own qualities with the other people. The coal comparison is mainly proposed by the Leon festinger in the year 1954.
According to the given scenario, the self evaluation is basically conducted by the Lori is best illustrate example of the social comparison as people generally compared themselves with the other people for the purpose of self motivation and improvement.
Therefore, Social comparison is the correct answer.
Answer:
Credit card companies can invade your privacy by monitoring all your credit card transactions and making decisions, whether correct or incorrect, about your credit worthiness and your character.
Explanations:
All credit card transactions are logged into a data base which is accessible to credit card companies.
Therefore credit card companies can form opinions about your credit worthiness on the basis of your credit card transactions.
For example, if you use your credit card to pay for groceries, utilities, and ordinary bills, a credit card company could assume that you are in financial distress and make a decision to reduce your credit limit.
If a person uses a credit card often at a casino or gambling locations, that could also signify to credit card issuers that the person may not be using money wisely, and may not be willing to provide more credit to the gambler.
To sum it up, personal privacy is lost whenever a person uses a credit card. Credit card issuers may form opinions about a card holder that may be correct or incorrect, based on the person's credit card transactions.