It important for local communities to work to protect the environment because the natural resources available to a community are limited
- Because the natural resources available to a community are limited
<u>Explanation:</u>
Ecological preservation is significant for some, reasons, including securing the ozone layer, keeping up the creature and human evolved ways of life, saving consumable water and utilizing non-sustainable assets. It is to a greater extent an ethical commitment for people to shield nature from contamination and different exercises that lead to ecological corruption.
Giving local communities control over natural resources could help protect the world's wildlife, according to a study of how animal extinctions affect people and society. Nature is a significant issue in any event when society is looked at with monetary emergencies, wars, and ceaseless social issues. It is important on the grounds that Earth is the main home that people have, and it gives air, nourishment, and different needs.
It's somewhat a matter of opinion, since many people have their favorites and it always looks good if you answer "Nelson Mandela". The truth is that after WW 2, the world got divided into a "Western" bloc under US leadership and a Communist bloc under the Soviet Union. The various US Presidents and Communist Party Secretaries all shaped the world in the Cold War era. A good candidate however is Soviet party leader Mikhail Gorbatchev, who practically single-handedly dismantled the old Soviet Union and thereby ended Communist rule over many eastern European countries. Americans tend to thank Ronald Reagan for that, but that is vastly overrating his actual influence on affairs. We Westerners like Gorbatchev for that, but in Russia he is generally seen as a weak leader and the man who 'sold out' Russia's global power and prestige and who was responsible for much of the following unrest until "thank God" Vladimir Putin took firm control and put Russia back on the map again.
During President Johnson's administration, citizens of Texas became more liberal, and there was a political shift in Texas to democracy.
<h3>What is democracy?</h3>
Democracy is a form of government where people determines who they want to lead them for a given period of time.
They cast vote and elect the candidate of their choice as the leader or the one in charge of authority.
Therefore, During President Johnson's administration, citizens of Texas became more liberal. They resented welfare programs and thought that the federal government had too much power. This began a political shift in Texas to democracy
Learn more on democracy here,
brainly.com/question/3710021
#SPJ1
I and others here don’t have the text in front of us that your question mentions. I’ll simply offer some thoughts.
I do not believe the US was justified in its invasion of Iraq. The claim that Saddam Hussein had large stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction turned out to be false. The allegations of that were exaggerated in order to justify gout to war. There was no hard evidence that the weapons existed.
The idea of a pre-emptive strike also was a poor justification for war. The US had never gone to war on that basis before. It put the US in the role of the aggressor nation in the conflict.
Conservatives were against all of these things, especially during the Reagan Administration.
