1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ziro4ka [17]
3 years ago
15

.31 points pls help Write a research-based argumentative essay for or against free education for children worldwide.

English
2 answers:
OleMash [197]3 years ago
7 0
I’m not trying to earn points bc I’m deleting this app, but why is nothing showing up for me. Literally, I cant see anything except “write a”.
Ann [662]3 years ago
3 0
This is agreeing that education should be free for children world wide and heres why.

According to UNESCO, 264 million children do not go to school, and the number is increasing 1 million every year. If Education is free for everyone then every student will get an equal opportunity and they don’t have to worry about anything than their studies. It ought to be free in light of the fact that there are poor who are keen, brainy and competent, yet the state gives no instruction to them. If the state paid for their education, students would have better opportunities, more time to study and more job opportunities.

If student get a free education then there might be many problems and need for colleges to fulfill students needs. Universities would require more dormitories, classrooms, labs and everything else, along these lines making the requirement for gigantic capital uses, which would overwhelm state spending plans. According to Andrew P. Kelly in the article, “The Problem Is That Free College Isn’t Free” he tells that even if student get free education 33% of understudies from the base pay quartile who began at a junior college in 2003 completed a degree or declaration by 2009. Two-year understudies from the best pay quartile didn’t improve (42 percent). He also tells that the way that 60 to 70 percent of junior college understudies need to take no less than one remedial course, as complete 40 percent of those at open four-year establishments. Or then again the way that understudies who go to open four-year universities with lower graduation rates are less inclined to complete than comparable associates who go to better schools. Realistically, people who cannot afford money for their colleges are going to miss their opportunity to make their future life bright. Free education will increase concentration on studies because they don’t have to worry about their other stuffs than their study and it will expand their knowledge. According to Samah Ae in the article, “University education should be free. Do you agree or disagree?” she tells that researchers have demonstrated that nations who offer free education have the incredible rate of advancements and grow quicker. So, when governments bolster colleges monetarily, they will take their money back through advancement and the high life standard. For example, universities who gives scholarship to qualified student is a opportunity to earn degree even if they cannot afford colleges.

Free education can motivate students to concentrate and focus more on their studies than spending more time in their work and less time in study. In order to get a good grade student, need a lot of concentration and hard work toward their study. According to Ronald Brownstein in the article, “The Problem with Public Colleges Going Tuition-Free” he tells us that wiping out educational cost at open universities could be an incredible method for growing chance and preparing an undeniably assorted America to contend in the worldwide economy. He also states that dispensing with state funded college educational cost for most families could support all the more low-salary youngsters to seek after advanced education by flagging them since early on that they can manage the cost of it

Hence, education should be free since it is understudies appropriate to get a chance to enhance their lives. It can cost a great deal for the state but on the other hand the surprises and advantage are priceless to the society.
You might be interested in
What is the theme of the boy in the stripped pajamas? And what's are three quotes that relate to that theme+ page number
Setler [38]

Answer:

Family and Friendship

Family and friendship are both important themes for Bruno, as he struggles to determine what role he plays in his household, and how to approach his friendship with Shmuel. Bruno has not been indoctrinated with a hatred for Jews, despite the fact that his father is high-ranking Nazi officer, but his parents do stress that he is not allowed to go near the fence, and his father refers to the people in the “striped pajamas” as “not really people at all.” Bruno then feels a tension between what his family has told him about staying away from the fence, and the bond he feels with Shmuel, the skinny boy on the other side of the fence. Though Bruno knows very little about why Shmuel is in the camp or why he is not supposed to talk to him, Bruno ultimately allows his friendship to supersede his obedience to his parents and Gretel.

While Bruno feels respect for his Mother and Father, he understands that all is not well in the family dynamic. Mother is very unhappy when they move away from Berlin, and Father becomes even more secretive and commanding around the household. Bruno is horrified when Pavel, an old man who seems to live in the camp at night but do work in the household during the day, is harshly reprimanded for spilling wine. Pavel was once very kind to Bruno when he fell off a swing, bandaging Bruno’s knee and telling Bruno that he used to be a doctor. Bruno is thus torn between his positive experiences with the prisoners as very kind but sad people, and his parents’ descriptions of them as subhuman, and somehow the “opposite” of Bruno. This tension ultimately serves as an allegory for the pseudoscience and indoctrination spread by the Nazi Party during World War II, claiming the Germans to be greater than all other nationalities, particularly in respect to the “Jewish problem” in Europe. At the end of the story, with his head shaven, Bruno can find very few differences between himself and his new best friend. Despite Father’s exalted rank within the German army, his son dies the same death as the people he puts into the concentration camp. Thus the book’s “moral” ultimately declares that despite differences of nationality, race, gender, or religion, at a basic level we all desire compassion and companionship, and deserve the same level of dignity and human rights.

"Bruno was sure that he had never seen a skinnier or sadder boy in his life but decided that he had better talk to him."

"Shmuel looked very sad when he told this story and Bruno didn’t know why; it didn’t seem like such a terrible thing to him, and after all much the same thing had happened to him."

"Bruno tried to return to his book, but he’d lost interest in it for now and stared out at the rain instead and wondered whether Shmuel, wherever he was, was thinking about him too and missing their conversations as much as he was."

Explanation from: litcharts

I do not have the page numbers for the quotes sorry.

5 0
3 years ago
To find a word s meaning, the reader can study the surrounding words, which are called the
monitta
I believe the answer is Context Clues.
8 0
3 years ago
GIVING BRAINLIEST!!!
valentina_108 [34]

Answer:

i would say a city state

Explanation:

An urban area that controls neighboring farmland that is not under the control of an empire or another government is a "D.city-state", since this has the relative control of a federal government without the responsibility of dealing with multiple "states".

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a common mistake that people make when writing summaries? writing their own notes crediting the author
nadya68 [22]
Including too much information in a summary is a mistake people make while writing summaries, since summaries are supposed to be short however have a meaningful message, and include all the important information. 
Hope this helped! :D
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the following sentence, identify the participle and the word the participle modifies. Falling continually, the heavy, wet sno
Over [174]

Answer:

Correct answer:

Participle : falling

Word modified: snow

Explanation:

Participle is a kind of verb, called verbal,  it works as an adjective modifying pronouns and nouns. We have two forms of participle: present participles end in -ing and past participles end in -ed, -en, -d, -t, -n, or -ne  ds in -ing or -ed. The word verbal  means that a participle is like any other verbs and  indicates action or a state of being.

In the sentence:

Participle is falling - verb “ to fall” ending in ing

The word modified is snow, a singular noun.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement best describes the contrast between the stories "The Devil" and
    5·2 answers
  • Sentence is following bus into passive voice​
    12·1 answer
  • Plsss gyuss help me help me answer.. go answer thank you so much​
    7·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt below from “Women on the Breadlines” by Meridel LeSueur and answer the question that follows.
    13·2 answers
  • How do the three hunters advance the plot of the story in the open window
    9·1 answer
  • With which statement would the author most likely agree​
    7·1 answer
  • Identify the correct sentence.
    6·2 answers
  • What city is this please no links the u is supposed to be there
    9·2 answers
  • Main idea the author presented that you should not talk to strangers
    9·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast mr.’s and harpo’s experience in the movie: "The Color Purple."
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!