Extreme abolitionists did more harm than good because they
tended towards extreme militancy, and with their use of virulent words, the extreme
abolitionists turned off Southerners to their cause. This did more harm than
good, first to the slaves, then also the abolition cause in general.
I believe the answer is: negative transfer
Negative transfers refers to the process when a new learning is creating an interference toward previous knowledge.
In the scenario above, the interference happen to the children due to the conflict in identifying two different language that describe one same word/sentence.
Answer:
law of effect
Explanation:
Thorndike referred to this as the law of effect. In simple terms, Thorndike explains that if a certain stimulus/behavior has a favorable consequence, the subject will want to repeat this behavior. If it continues to have a favorable consequence then the subject will continue to repeat this behavior until it becomes a continuous pattern. The opposite applies to behaviors that have unfavorable consequences, the subject in question will associate the unfavorable consequence with the behavior and cease performing the behavior. The worse the consequence, the faster the subject will stop the behavior.
Her inference that the African American student was more likely to start the fight is an example of <u>stereotyping</u> whereas her behavior of suspending that student but not the other one is an example of <u>discrimination.</u>
Stereotyping simply refers to the generalized belief about a particular group of people. Discrimination is the act of making unjustified distinctions about a particular group of people.
Since she stated that the African American student was more likely to start the fight, this is an example of stereotyping and the fact that she only suspended one student is discrimination.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25523223
