Answer: The options are given below:
A. Vanessa should define new performance outcomes that do not include checking order status.
B. Hunter should develop more realistic goals that do not include checking order status.
C. Vanessa and Hunter should set new performance standards that are more realistic.
D. Vanessa should arrange for training so Hunter can learn how to look up the status of orders.
E. Vanessa should provide Hunter with ongoing performance feedback.
The correct option is D. Vanessa should arrange for training so Hunter can learn how to look up the status of orders.
Explanation: From the scenario given above, we can conclude that Hunter is a good purchasing agent, but a bad record keeper, since he finds it difficult to quickly come up with information about orders.
The next reasonable step to take in order to make Hunter perform better would be to arrange a training for Hunter in order to make him a better record keeper, and therefore be able to keep the records on his orders in a way that he will be able to quickly come up with the status of the orders of employees.
Answer: A. $53,300,000
Explanation:
Year 2019 balance for Investment
= Cash + Net income - amortization
Net income = Beginning retained earnings 2020 - Beginning retained earnings 2019
= 11 - 8
= 3 million
Balance 2019 = 50 + 3 - 1
= $52 million
Year 2020 balance
= Opening balance + Net income - amortization
= 52 + 1.8 - 0.5
= $53.3 million
= $53,300,000
Answer:
b) assessment lien.
Explanation:
In this scenario, The City of Grand Rapids installed a new water main on Oak Street. The city then decided to charge the property owners along Oak Street a proportional cost of the new water main. If a property owner refuses to pay their proportional share of the cost, the city may file assessment lien.
Assessment lien can be defined as a hold or a legal claim on a property being owed by another, while benefiting from an improvement or modification made and shall be deducted from the client for the improvements made by a municipal owner.
The case filed by Gerwin against Baker will be null and void, as thee is no existence of any legal contract between the parties as such.
<h3>What is a legal contract?</h3>
A contract is said to be a legal one when the party who is presented with such an offer accepts on the terms and with a condition that the offer must be for legal activities.
In case when any of the criterion mentioned above are not followed by the offeror or the offeree, then in such case, any lawsuit filed against the plaintiff will be considered as null and void.
Hence, it can be concluded that there is no legal contract between Gerwin and Baker, and thus their cases are null and void.
Learn more about a legal contract here:
brainly.com/question/3208041
#SPJ1
<span>quaker marketing message is designed to help the consumer to :
- Recognize a problem (which is that people often do not have enough time to make their own breakfast before go to work)
and
- </span><span>acknowledge breakfast as important and make it a priority in their busy day (and make customers aware that they need to consume something nutritious to be able to function properly at their job)</span>
