Answer:
The financial and economic crisis that started in 2007 tested central banks as they had not been tested for many decades. they needed to take swift and decisive action to limit the damage to the economy from the spreading distress in financial markets. Because the financial distress was so deep and pervasive and because it took place in financial markets whose structure had evolved dramatically, our actions also needed to be innovative if they were to have a chance of being effective. Many central banks made substantial changes to traditional policy tools as the crisis unfolded. But the epicenter of the financial shock was in U.S. mortgage markets, with severe effects on many of our financial institutions, and our financial markets had perhaps evolved more than many others. As a consequence, no central bank innovated more dramatically than the Federal Reserve.
Explanation:
not sure what to put here
hopes this helps and if not ill change it
Answer: place the non breaching party into the position that they would have been had the contract not been breached
Explanation:
A contract is meant to satisfy the reasons for which the contract was gone into for both parties. If one party breaches the contract, the party that did not breach should still have their reason for entering the contract satisfied because they did what they were supposed to do according to the contract.
This is why the purpose of a breach of contract remedy is to ensure that this non-breaching party does indeed get what was supposed to come to them by the contract.
Ideally, management should compare its budget to Actual <span>performance every month in order to determine if the company is performing as expected.
By doing this, the management could create some sort of financial control to prevent the company from bleeding out its budget without gaining a sustainable amount of profit</span>
umm laptops are around $150 to $250 for a cheep one so id say $1250,000 for 10000 laptops
Answer: Option C
Explanation:
A. In the above case the statement stating superiority of cookware is stated by the experts themselves thus it cannot be considered an assumption.
B. The above case clearly states that the magazine generates revenues from advertising thus it is not an assumption made, actually its a fact stated in the case that magazine will do so.
C. Nothing has been stats about the perspective of the cookware company as they might find the magazine unsuitable as there would be commercials for their competitors. Thus, we can say that it is an assumption.
