Due to the plague, the London theaters were often closed between June 1592 and April 1594. During that period, Shakespeare probably had some income from his pat ron, Henry Wriothesley, earl of Southampton, to whom he dedicated his first two poems, Venus and Adonis (1593) and The Ra pe of Lucrece (1594).
Both narrators possess pride in their faith.
Both narrators have a deep faith in God.
Both narrators are uncertain about wearing a religious head covering.
<em>Both narrators clearly show their desire to be part of their religion, pride in what they believe and faith in their God, the only issue they're concerned about it's the veil, a common accessory in their religion. </em>
<em>In the text, the narrator's speech is about convincing herself that using a veil would benefit herself and her relationship with God too. She wants to do it, but the fear, prejudices and other aspects make her uncertain about it.</em>
<em>In the picture, the girl admits her devotion to her religion since she was a child, however, now that she's grown, she finds herself reflective about a new issue: using a veil.</em>
Answer and Explanation:
Vonnegut's letter and 1984 are showing how the hiding of messages and concepts is done by people who are in power to manipulate, alienate and limit people's access to information that will make them reason.
These two works show how the reasoning of the mass, of the people is dangerous for the powerful and for that reason, they will try their best to deny any type of media that encourages racism at the expense of alienation. This occurs through the censorship of books, the denial of historical facts and the positioning as a figure that contains the truth and that must be followed. This occurs through manipulation.
However, even in the midst of these similarities, these two works present some differences, mainly regarding the level of power of the active manipulative force. In Vonnegut's letter, this force has a more domestic power and is limited to a region, which shows that the capacity for manipulation may be closer to what we imagine and it is necessary to perceive and fight it. In 1984, the manipulative force is something comprehensive, governmental and greater, which has the power to interfere in absolutely any factor and any element of human knowledge.
<h3>He plays well.</h3>
It will become PLAYS because we are converting it in positive and also it is in present.
