1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gavmur [86]
3 years ago
8

Part A: Prepare your own scenarios, using Gidgits Galore as your backdrop.

Law
1 answer:
Margaret [11]3 years ago
3 0
Number 6 is right hope it helps
You might be interested in
1. Read Both Bills. Circle the parts that the two
Andrei [34K]

Answer:

i dont know sorry xd

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Who was the 4th President of the US?
MrMuchimi

Answer:

4th President of the US: James Madison

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the court of law are what's to the right of the judge?
geniusboy [140]
C. is your answer ...........
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When parking a pill in a car with a manual transmission you should park with the transmission in
MrRa [10]
After you have positioned your car into a parking space, shift your car into first gear if it has a manual transmission or into park if it has an automatic transmission. Leaving your car in neutral or drive will increase the risk of it rolling backwards or forwards. Next, apply your emergency brake.
4 0
3 years ago
How does the Fourth Amendment protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the police? When are there exceptio
sammy [17]

INTERESTS PROTECTED

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable intrusions by the government. However, the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee protection from all searches and seizures, but only those done by the government and deemed unreasonable under the law. To claim violation of Fourth Amendment as the basis for suppressing a relevant evidence, the court had long required that the claimant must prove that he himself was the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing to claim protection under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has departed from such requirement, issue of exclusion is to be determined solely upon a resolution of the substantive question whether the claimant's Fourth Amendment rights have been violated, which in turn requires that the claimant demonstrates a justifiable expectation of privacy, which was arbitrarily violated by the government. In general, most warrantless searches of private premises are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, unless specific exception applies. For instance, a warrantless search may be lawful, if an officer has asked and is given consent to search; if the search is incident to a lawful arrest; if there is probable cause to search and there is exigent circumstance calling for the warrantless search. Exigent circumstances exist in situations where a situation where people are in imminent danger, where evidence faces imminent destruction, or prior to a suspect's imminent escape. On the other hand, warrantless search and seizure of properties are not illegal, if the objects being searched are in plain view. Further, warrantless seizure of abandoned property, or of properties on an open field do not violate Fourth Amendment, because it is considered that having expectation of privacy right to an abandoned property or to properties on an open field is not reasonable. However, in some states, there are some exception to this limitation, where some state authorities have granted protection to open fields. States can always establish higher standards for searches and seizures protection than what is required by the Fourth Amendment, but states cannot allow conducts that violate the Fourth Amendment. Where there was a violation of one’s fourth amendment rights by federal officials, A bivens action can be filed against federal law enforcement officials for damages, resulting from an unlawful search and seizure. Under the Bivens action, the claimant needs to prove that there has been a constitutional violation of the fourth amendment rights by federal officials acting under the color of law. However, the protection under the Fourth Amendment can be waived if one voluntarily consents to or does not object to evidence collected during a warrantless search or seizure.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What evidence led authorities to believe Jimmy committed the crime?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the second amendment created
    7·2 answers
  • What was the name of the case when puyallup city council attempted renovations on shaw road in 2016?
    5·2 answers
  • Please help me by answering !
    9·1 answer
  • Laws that help give society
    10·1 answer
  • How can you drop two eggs the fewest amount of times, without them breaking?
    15·2 answers
  • 6. Depth perception, color recognition, and
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following physical characteristics is not a common indicator that a person may be a minor
    15·1 answer
  • How many senators must vote for a motion of cloture?
    11·1 answer
  • In the house of representatives what is the next step in the legislative process immediately after a debate is scheduled
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!