Answer:
Motion for the extension of time for release of evidence
Explanation:
This is a pretrial application made by the prosecuting attorney on behalf of the claimant seeking for an extension of time for the release of evidence by the prime witnesses in order to prove the guilt of the accused person in the commission of the offence of arson.
In otherwords, Eleanor as the prosecuting attorney who has a strong case against the defendant needs time to prove to the court that the defendant is guilty of the offence of arson through the evidence of the prime eye-witnesses who were present at the scene where the offence was committed.
1.Margret can say as she was in a hurry that's why the mistake took place.
Explanation:
Margret can say that as she had to avail another connecting flight thus she was in a hurry , so my mistake instead of taking her laptop he took someone else. If they want to know regarding the matter they can go to the airport and can check the lost list. After knowing the fact Margret must have informed it to the airport.
2.Success rate is more in case of Margret case.
Explanation:
Prosecutors as well as police don't charge cases until and unless they get proper evidence of that particular incidents. According to the prosecutors until and unless more evidence occur the accused cannot be convicted.
Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. However, I provided explanations about the<em> Charter of Rights and Freedoms </em>law.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The<em> Charter of Rights and Freedoms</em> law is a law applied in Canada, which was first signed as law dating back to the year 1982. It basically consists of laws meant to safeguard the rights and freedoms of citizens, such as their:
- freedom of expression,
- right to equality, and
- right to privacy, etc.
In mathematics, the intersection of two sets A and B, denoted by A ∩ B, is the set containing all elements of A that also belong to B (or equivalently, all elements of B that also belong to A). I don’t know what the w is sorry.
