This is a conflict of individual rights versus state protection. For some, the individual rights come first even if it is an attack on others or could put the country at risk. For others, the protection of the country is more important and therefore a person who speaks in a way that threatens the country should and can be silenced.
Schenck v. US is a famous case where the court ruled if the speech presents a danger to the country then the 1st Amendment right is not applicable and can be denied.
Tinker v. Des Moines School District demonstrated when a person peacefully protest even in a school against the government and their decisions (Vietnam War in this case), then the 1st Amendment is applied and the individual rights upheld.
<u>Which of the following techniques was not introduced during the Baroque Period?</u>
<em>C. Sfumato</em>
<em>Sfumato</em> (blurred) was a technique developed during the Italian Renaissance period. The technique consists of shading the shapes or lines of the figures placing thin paint layers to obtain subtle color or light grading. Leonardo da Vinci was known for using this technique on his work.
Answer:
1. The British had exhausted their resources (army and money) and didn't have the required manpower pool to keep the British Raj from functioning.
2. The Indians was felt they deserved independence after helping the British after WW2 in the North African campaign and other theaters of war.
This was not internet searched/pirated
FYI: I only know about WW2 history, so sorry if they are other reasons.
John Henry sold documents called the Henry Papers to the United States persuading treason by federalists with great Britain. these Henry Papers built anger against Britain (he was a spy).
It was the size of the crowd. Thousands marched to the Lincoln Memorial
where they called for more freedom and more job opportunities. These were denied to many African Americans
due to the system of segregation. Many
prominent speakers lent their voices to the march including Dr. Martin Luther
King, Jr.
