No according to me the parole system should not be abolished but it should be more strict and done in more specific platforms cases.
Explanation:
According to my opinion, the parole should not be abolished but it should be categorized for some specific cases. The court system needs to define or create a category in which some specific or certain cases fall.
On the basis of nature of case, the court need to grant parole such as in theft cases while in cases like murder, attempt to murder, kidnapping which are more dangerous in nature, should not grant parole.
Thus specification is a required amendment rather than abolishing.
A. True the parent is responsible for the safety of the child in all cases
Pretexting is the act or practice of gaining information about a subject by misrepresentation or under false pretenses. Pretexting is capable to leaving companies involved open to liability claims
The need to understand when pretexting is illegal within federal and state laws, how pretexting has been interpreted by the courts, the type of pretexting that are legal but also not advisable, as well as steps to take against being pretexting when investigative tasks are outsourced
The use of pretext to obtain telephone records or financial information is explicitly against federal law and pretexting used for criminal purposes are stopped by prosecutors using other existing federal laws
However, pretexting in the form of undercover investigation is completely legal, provided the investigator does not present them selves as a person of authority
Learn more about using ruses and pretexting to obtain confidential information here:
brainly.com/question/9321150
brainly.com/question/14049478
