1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ludmilka [50]
3 years ago
9

Before they were conquered by Philip II, what form of government did many Greek city-states have?

History
2 answers:
Taya2010 [7]3 years ago
5 0
A democracy it used that
Bess [88]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A, Democracy

Explanation:

I got it correct and I hope you guys do too, God bless you all

You might be interested in
How did Vietnam become a single communist nation
Oduvanchick [21]

Vietnam become a single communist nation through the leadership and influence of Who Chi Minh. He embraced communism and he got support from China and Soviet Union to fight the French regime.

Hope this helps you! Brainliest? :)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who had more power in Hawaii: the Hawaiian people or American business? Why do you think that this is important?
kramer

Answer:

mag module ka wag puro ml

8 0
3 years ago
Why did political leaders blame the Article of Confederation for economic condition?
iragen [17]

Answer:

The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union Is the Answer

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was an agreement among the 13 original states of the United States of America that served as its first constitution.[1] It was approved, after much debate (between July 1776 and November 1777), by the Second Continental Congress on November 15, 1777, and sent to the states for ratification. The Articles of Confederation came into force on March 1, 1781, after being ratified by all 13 states. A guiding principle of the Articles was to preserve the independence and sovereignty of the states. The weak central government established by the Articles received only those powers which the former colonies had recognized as belonging to king and parliament.[2]

The document provided clearly written rules for how the states' "league of friendship" would be organized. During the ratification process, the Congress looked to the Articles for guidance as it conducted business, directing the war effort, conducting diplomacy with foreign states, addressing territorial issues and dealing with Native American relations. Little changed politically once the Articles of Confederation went into effect, as ratification did little more than legalize what the Continental Congress had been doing. That body was renamed the Congress of the Confederation; but most Americans continued to call it the Continental Congress, since its organization remained the same.[2]

As the Confederation Congress attempted to govern the continually growing American states, delegates discovered that the limitations placed upon the central government rendered it ineffective at doing so. As the government's weaknesses became apparent, especially after Shays' Rebellion, some prominent political thinkers in the fledgling union began asking for changes to the Articles. Their hope was to create a stronger government. Initially, some states met to deal with their trade and economic problems. However, as more states became interested in meeting to change the Articles, a meeting was set in Philadelphia on May 25, 1787. This became the Constitutional Convention. It was quickly agreed that changes would not work, and instead the entire Articles needed to be replaced.[3] On March 4, 1789, the government under the Articles was replaced with the federal government under the Constitution.[4] The new Constitution provided for a much stronger federal government by establishing a chief executive (the President), courts, and taxing powers.

Mark Me As Brainliest Please

6 0
3 years ago
Compare the federal government's role in the fight against communism with its role in the fight against racial discrimination. H
DedPeter [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

If we make a comparison between the federal government's role in the fight against communism with its role in the fight against racial discrimination, we find considerable differences.

During the Red Scare of the 1920s, the federal government of the United States was very concerned about the presence of anarchists and communists in the United States territory. That is why US President Woodrow Wilson ordered the Department of Justice to initiate the Palmer Raids to arrest communists and anarchists.

During the Second Red Scare in the times of Wisconsin Republican Senator Joseph McCartney, he accused the presence of communists in the interior of the US federal government and the military. The problem was that he accused but never presented valid evidence.

One way or the other the federal government was worried, concerned, and act in many different ways.

Regarding the fight against racial discrimination, the federal government has acted very differently. It seems that the government is not as interested as in the above-mentioned cases. It seems that it has not the same political interest as in the case of anarchism or communism. Truly, racism is not the first thing on the political agenda of the US.

How involved were citizens in these fights?

Citizens basically reacted with fear during the Red Sacre times. The government and mass media told them to be fearful of communist, and they were afraid. And they started to accuse people with no evidence at all.  

Regarding the fight against racism, here it seems that some US citizens are more concerned about this issue and have actively participated in public demonstrations.

4 0
3 years ago
Answer each of the questions below. Answer each question in paragraph form using complete sentences, proper capitalization, and
insens350 [35]

Andrew Jackson's presidency was known for expanding democracy and empowering the Executive. However, he treated Native Americans harshly. These actions were normal in his time however.

<h3>What was Andrew Jackson's presidency like?</h3>

Under Andrew Jackson, the "Common man" or rather the "Common White Man" gained the right to vote because states expanded voting rights to every White man instead just those who owned land.

The Executive also became quite powerful under Jackson who took it on par with Congress with his various unilateral actions.

However, Native Americans were treated with increasing racism which culminated in tens of thousands of them being expelled from their Native lands to make way for White settlement.

Find out more on Andrew Jackson at brainly.com/question/26768369.

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Opinions on matters of law are provided by the _______________.
    8·2 answers
  • Which policy do as common to the Harding, Coolidge and Hoover Administration
    15·1 answer
  • During wwii the United States was a member of the
    10·1 answer
  • A series of natural disasters occurred to negitively effect the Aztec civilization. In 1449 a devistating flood wiped out the cr
    7·1 answer
  • According to the map in the Communism vs. NATO presentation, which nations were NATO members in 1949?
    6·1 answer
  • What factors have gotten more complicated as the world has become multipolar? Select all that apply. 1)crime 2)trade 3)foreign 4
    9·2 answers
  • Where did Robert E .lee surrender and why ?
    8·1 answer
  • Which methods of defense are common to both amphibians and reptiles? Check all that apply.
    15·2 answers
  • What were the 2 major developments during the prehistoric period and why were they significant?
    14·1 answer
  • Americans responded to the Second Great Awakening by- *
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!