The removal of a political leader due to irresponsible behavior or actions.
Answer:A. Companies use investments to pay for services that improve their productivity.
Explanation:
The best description of the relationship between investments and productivity is that A. Companies use investments to pay for services that improve their productivity.
Investments made by companies include:
Increasing the production capacity factories
Buying more efficient machinery and equipment
Hiring more people
All of the above are needed to improve productivity which means that if a company wants to improve its productivity, it will need to make investments that enable it to do so.
In conclusion, investments are needed to increase productivity.
Answer:
wagwan (Jamaican, MLE) Greeting equivalent to what's up or what's happening. Usage notes. It is used through out the Jamaican diaspora, including in hip-hop culture and by reggae music fans. The standard response is nagwan / nuttin nah gwaan (“ nothing is going on ”).
hope that helps
Answer: 1. retain their maiden surnames
2. paternal surname
3. Lourdes Blanco de Arias
4. maternal surname
Explanation:
In Spanish-speaking countries such as Chile and Spain, married women retain their surnames instead of taking their husband’s surname. When they take their husband’s name, '<em>de'</em> is used, meaning 'of'. So, Lourdes Blanco Cabrera married to Carlos Arias Delgado can be referred to as Lourdes Blanco de Arias. When there are two surnames which are joined with a hyphen or the letter ‘y’ the first surname is the father’s surname and the second is the mother’s first surname.
1. In most Spanish-speaking countries, married women legally retain their maiden surnames
2. In the name María Antonia Abad Fernández, Abad is the paternal surname.
3. If Lourdes Blanco Cabrera marries Carlos Arias Delgado, she could present herself as Lourdes Blanco de Arias
4. In the name Luis Felipe González y Pérez, Pérez is the maternal surname
Under the principles discussed in "A Sample Court Case," United States v. Jones, the court is most likely to rule that the officers' installation of the device was not a search because the officers did not obtain a warrant. Chris's argument was right; there should be a warrant presented for it to be considered as a lawful search.
