Answer: One major difference is that King's believes that slavery didn't play a role, while Burns' does. A historical event that could support King's is when Congress established the Freedmen's Bureau in 1865. This provided aid to African Americans in their transition from slavery to freedom. A historical event that could support Burns' is Dred Scott v. Sandford. The case in 1857 declared that slaves and blacks descended from slaves and were not American citizens and cannot sue, so this could have led to outrage and war.
B. It was the first time for many in working a factory
<span>Agriculture and domestication of animals. Both allowed for an increase in food while causing people to remain in one location. That allowed specialization of tasks and created the need for record keeping and government.</span>
The union attempted to blockade other southern states. By doing this the union thought they could cause the economy of the confederate states to collapse
Answer:
C.) Lincoln's efforts to abolish slavery
Explanation:
Lincoln had two great successes in his two terms as president, the first was to <u>abolish the slavery of people of color</u>, based on the fact that all men are equal and born free, this was a great struggle, which generated many consequences, among which This is the civil war that the southern states undertook, but even so, this was not an impediment to leaving their mark on history for abolishing slavery.
