Answer: Option C
Explanation: In simple words, critical dilemma refers to the confusions and problems that may arise and are pretty hard to solve.
While implementing fiscal policies in an economy the authorities must have proper information however the information takes time and cost to get collected and processed.
This situation is called information lag and is a critical dilemma as the individuals in authority have to decide whether to go for information processing and collecting or not.
Answer:
Public bank
Explanation:
A public bank is a bank, or a financial institution where a state, municipality would be the owners also it is an entrerprise that are controlled by the government
So as per the given situation the given boston would be acted as an underwriter and engaged in the initial public offering so this represent the public bank
hence, the same would be relevant
Answer:
- Low supply
- Scarcity
- Low economic growth
Explanation:
When suppliers under invest in their business, they will end up having the capacity to only produce less than the market requires. Should this happen, supply will be reduced in the market which would lead to relative scarcity all else being equal.
For economic growth to happen, there must be increasing production in an economy so if suppliers are under investing and production is low, there might be low or no economic growth.
Answer:
The answer to this question is c. Kathy has to pay based on a quasi contract.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario displayed above Kathy has to pay based on a quasi contract.
A Quasi contract is a contract that is created by a court order, not by an agreement made by the parties to the contract. For example, quasi contracts are created by the court when no official agreement exists between the parties, in disputes over payments for goods or services
In this case there has not been an official agreement between Kathy and the hospital, However she has to pay the bill presented to her based on Quasi contract which is created to prevent an individual to be unjustly enriched or from benefiting from the situation when he/she does not deserve to do so.
Hence the answer is c. Kathy has to pay based on a quasi contract.
Answer:
The lump sum invested was $2,730.30.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Invested one lump sum 17 years ago at 4.25 percent interest. Today, the proceeds totaled $5,539.92.
We need to calculate the original amount that this person invested 17 years ago. We will use the following formula:
PV= FV/(1+i)^n
PV= 5,539.92/ (1.0425)^17
PV= $2,730.30
