Answer: A summary could be followed by a Conclusion, at least it seems reasonable if you get up and have something to say, something of enough importance to convey, you certainly can summarize what you tried to get across, and lastly provide a conclusion to make the Speech and your point of giving it, (at last complete), with a Conclusion.
This is simply my opinion, and I am not referencing any “rule book”, just what I find to be reasonable.
A final Conclusion would by this time,
allow the listener to evaluate all the speaker had said and why. It would have a greater purpose beyond a mere exercise.
This is, again, simply my view on the question and a proposed answer.
Explanation:
Then, in a brief paragraph, explain the way that these first two sections are organized. Be sure to clearly summarize the points of each section, and explain if there are any subsections. Be sure that you use transitions clearly so that the reader will understand the organization of the contents of these sections.
I believe it would be D. ..
Its very hard to make a hook/intro without the basic outline/body
You don't have to worry about punctuation or spelling in a rough/first draft
You can always revise and make the tone more in with the subject.
First draft you would be mainly writing down all the information/ thoughts in your mind so you can look back and go through and decide whats more appropriate for your topic
Use examples of dialogue that are relevant to the conflict of the text. Also describe two events that led to the conflict of the story a.k.a the rising action
