It really all comes down to money.
The perfect illustrative example of this would be the Department of Education. States have the power to enact their own education policies and nowhere is education laid out as a federal duty. And yet, a Federal department exists.
They enter by setting policies and giving enough money to the States to follow the federal policies.
Can i get a list of possible answers plz?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Insurance is a financial service that offers a kind of protection in the event of unforeseen damage, injury, or loss.
A premium is the cost of a type of insurance that is paid at a regular interval.
A copayment is a money a consumer must pay to share the costs of a payout.
When we talk about financial services, insurance helps people to share liability with the insurance company. That is why the client buys insurance, to diminish or mitigate the risk in the case of an event. For that to happen, the client has to pay for the premium, that is the kind if the insurance that is going to protect the client and be valid in the case of an event. When the client uses the insurance, it has to make a copayment that shares the costs of the payout.
Direct democracy and pure democracy are the same thing. All decisions are based and voted on by the people.
Answer:
According to the Second Amendment, all US citzens were allowed to bear and keep arms. It is not clear whether that provided the right to individual self-defense or to state militias.
Explanation:
The Second Amendment of the Constitution that was adopted in 1791 was meant to provide a check on congressional power and the federal government under Article I Section 8. This is the section of the Amendment that addresses the rights of the individual to organize, arm and discipline the federal militia. This amendment is controversial in modern society today because some people interpret it as the Constitutional defense for an individual to bear arms. It is an important part of the controversy over gun control in the United States.
There is some disagreement about the extent to which this right was applicable because the Second Amendment reads "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." There are therefore some who say that the right to bear arms is only in the context of militias needed to defend the rights of the state.
