Answer: problem-solving teams
Explanation: group of individuals assembled to work on a project that involves resolving one or more issues that have already arisen or to deal effectively with issues as they arise. In a business context, a problem solving team will typically be formed for a limited time frame incorporating staff from different organizational levels with various relevant skill sets.Problem Solving Teams are temporary structures that bring together leaders and team members from across the organization to focus on solving a specific problem. The benefits are many, including not just a solved problem, but also a more resilient organization, a stronger social network and a growing cohort of problem solvers with increased skills and abilities. This approach draws from many influences, including complexity science, social network theory, military doctrine, flight crews, and emergency responders. We have been experimenting with this approach across several areas that involve multiple geographies and multiple functions.
The spending that would occur during the third round of spending if the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) was 0.6 will be $420 billion.
- Increase in expenditure = $700 billion.
- Marginal propensity to consume = 0.6
The amount of spending based on the information given will be:
= 0.6 × $700 billion
= $420 billion.
Therefore, the correct option is $420 billion.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/17012549
(b.) FALSE
The marketing channel is a downstream portion of a supply chain that reaches from point of production to the consumer. It connects the product to the customer. The downstream process refers to the processing of materials and make a finished product.
As of 2011, the world's population has reached 7 billion. The annual population growth rate is 1.2%, thereby there would be an additional 1 billion population growth at approximately 11 years or by 2021 the population would be 8 billion.
Answer:
Sink-Cost Fallacy
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various behaviorists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the mental bias that describes Les's behavior is called the Sink-Cost Fallacy. This fallacy/bias refers to when an individual relentlessly continues's a behavior solely because of the resources that they have invested, either being time, money, or effort. Which in this case since, Les invested money into the drink so he does not want to waste it even though it might make him sick.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
