Answer:
Explanation:
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark 1896 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. The case stemmed from an 1892 incident in which African American train passenger Homer Plessy refused to sit in a car for Black people. Rejecting Plessy’s argument that his constitutional rights were violated, the Supreme Court ruled that a law that “implies merely a legal distinction” between white people and Black people was not unconstitutional. As a result, restrictive Jim Crow legislation and separate public accommodations based on race became commonplace.
Plessy v. Ferguson: Background and Context
After the Compromise of 1877 led to the withdrawal of federal troops from the South, Democrats consolidated control of state legislatures throughout the region, effectively marking the end of Reconstruction.
Southern Black people saw the promise of equality under the law embodied by the 13th Amendment, 14th Amendment and 15th Amendment to the Constitution receding quickly, and a return to disenfranchisement and other disadvantages as white supremacy reasserted itself across the South.
As historian C. Vann Woodward pointed out in a 1964 article about Plessy v. Ferguson, white and Black Southerners mixed relatively freely until the 1880s, when state legislatures passed the first laws requiring railroads to provide separate cars for “Negro” or “colored” pa_sengers.
Florida became the first state to mandate segr_gated railroad cars in 1887, followed in quick succession by Mississippi, Texas, Louisiana and other states by the end of the century.
(hope this helps can i plz have brainlist :D hehe)
That is because the Spaniards controlled the seas. They had a vast armada that controlled the seas and nobody could go to the new world. When the Brits took over and beat the armada, they started developing the trade and colonies more and establish their own mercantile policies.
<span />
One of the main reasons that pushed the American colonists towards wanting independence from the British was because of taxes. They wanted England<span> to take away unfair taxes and acts.</span>
The event that will cause tension between the competing values of individualism and rule of law is harsher criminal penalties for use of recreational drugs.
<h3>What is individualism & rule of law?</h3>
This means a theory that favors the freedom of action for individuals over collective control while the rule of law places every one below the power of law.
A tension will be cause between the competing values of individualism and rule of law when there is a harsher criminal penalties for use of recreational drugs.
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about individualism
<em>brainly.com/question/18405002</em>
#SPJ1
Well, it's not the Ku Klux Klan, as that was a large group of people who wanted to have slaves all return to their work, I've never heard of C, and we barely touched on D in school. From what I've learned, however, the Freedmen's Bureau helped former slaves by supplying food, providing education and homes, etc.
