The average number of failures can be found by multiplying .41 (equivalent to 41%) by 375. When you do this, you get 153.75 failures. Rounded to the nearest 10th is 153.8 failures; the nearest whole number, 154 failures.
No, this would not be a linear function. Being linear means it creates a straight line, but this function has an x squared. Anytime x^2 is in a function, the graph is a u shape, called a parabola. A simple linear function is y=x :D
Answer:
A. 4+ 13w and C. 2(2+6w) + w
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helps! They equal the same answer which is 13w + 4
Answer:
3x²-29x+4
Step-by-step explanation:
3x²-x-4=-30x
0=-30x-3x²+x+4
0=-3x²-29x+4
You're looking for the largest number <em>x</em> such that
<em>x</em> ≡ 1 (mod 451)
<em>x</em> ≡ 4 (mod 328)
<em>x</em> ≡ 1 (mod 673)
Recall that
<em>x</em> ≡ <em>a</em> (mod <em>m</em>)
<em>x</em> ≡ <em>b</em> (mod <em>n</em>)
is solvable only when <em>a</em> ≡ <em>b</em> (mod gcd(<em>m</em>, <em>n</em>)). But this is not the case here; with <em>m</em> = 451 and <em>n</em> = 328, we have gcd(<em>m</em>, <em>n</em>) = 41, and clearly
1 ≡ 4 (mod 41)
is not true.
So there is no such number.
