Answer:
Supporters of Laissez faire believe that this type of system promotes more incentives to trade and economic growth, in addition to encouraging freedom among companies.
Supporters of economic intervention, on the other hand, believe that the intervention promotes fairer and more equitable trade and allows new companies to become as influential as old companies, which will promote economic growth.
Explanation:
Economic intervention allows the government of a country to impose limits and interference in trade and the productive sector. These limitations prevent economically strong companies from dominating an entire productive sector, promoting more commercial fairness and allowing new companies to emerge in addition to allowing small companies to grow in the same sector as large companies.
Laissez Faire, on the other hand, discredits any government intervention in trade and this imposes freedom on companies and industries, which will allow full production and vast economic growth.
1. They’re many numerous reasons starting with the effects of the Treaty Of Versailles, the rise of the military in Germany and Japan, and the failure of the League Of Nations.
2. Because of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor
It would be B <span>The U.S. Senate agreed to join the League of Nations if the Soviet Union would also join.</span>
It changed what they thought about who should govern them and it changed what they thought about the purpose of government. Before the Enlightenment, essentially everyone agreed that countries should be governed by monarchs. They believed that God had appointed certain people to rule over others