Do you think colonial outrage over the Boston Massacre was justified? Explain.

1 answer:

7 0

The shock that happened over the Boston Massacre was not defended, as I would see it. This is on the grounds that there was proof highlighting the way that the fighters were incited to fire and were being bugged by the homesteaders. The warriors were being hollered at to discharge and the rest went like dominos in light of the fact that once the originally shot was shot, serious trouble come to the surface.

Not plagiarized so you can just add it :)

You might be interested in

In this country, the three main tribes are divided by culture, religion, and location, with the Muslim Hausa being the largest g

klemol [59]

I'm pretty sure the answer is b.) n<span>igeria.
</span>

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In the cheasapeake colonies what was the most important cash crop

Rus_ich [418]

Answer:tobacco is it

6 0

3 years ago

Which of the following best define humanisim

otez555 [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

What is the difference between the centralists and the federalists in Mexico?

Nataly [62]

Answer:

The Centralists were generally conservative and favoured a strong central government in the viceregal tradition, a paid national army, and Roman Catholicism as the exclusive religion. The Federalists favoured limited central government, local militia, and nearly autonomous states; they tended to be anticlerical and opposed the continuance of colonial fueros, which gave special status to ecclesiastics and the military and exempted them from various civil obligations.

7 0

2 years ago

Refer to the Newsela article “Issue Overview: Should the Descendants of Slaves Get Reparations?”

tamaranim1 [39]

Answer:

I do not know i"m looking for the same answer lol

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago