Answer:
CPC Inc. will probably lose the suit.
Explanation:
The Robinson-Patman Act contains the regulations that govern price discrimination. The purpose of this Act is to prevent unfair competition. The Act sets forth that a business must sell its products at the same price regardless of who the purchaser is. However, in the question at issue, there is a not-for-profit hospital involved, which is the buyer of the drugs. In this case, PharMax may resort to the Non-Profit Institutions Act (NPIA), which is the exemption to the Robinson–Patman Act referred to above, and claim that according to the NPIA, pharmaceutical manufacturers are entitled to sell hospitals, libraries and universities (non-profit institutions), discounted products. As a consequence, the hospital shall receive the drugs at a lower price than that charged to other retail pharmacy.
To sum up, there is no violation of the price discrimination laws and CPC Inc. will lose the lawsuit.
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
It broke the law.
Answer:
search up david litley
Explanation:
go onto the declaration of independence and get the answer
Almost anything would improve it. right now the election process is rigged and it has been proven, so we need to add people to watch others counting votes, we need to find GOOD people that are trusted, and they have to be completely unbiased. also no mail in ballots. those have been known to get burn or ripped or thrown out if they are for trump.
Answer:
No, on the contrary, I am totally against the granting of extraordinary powers to any political leader, whatever the issue. On the contrary, I think that every government official must have limited powers, controlled by the other branches of government. In this way, they will not be able to exceed their prerogatives, affecting the freedoms and rights of citizens.
