1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kompoz [17]
3 years ago
8

What would life be like without the 1st Amendment?

History
2 answers:
Talja [164]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Our lives would be ENTIRELY different. "The First Amendment states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” This shows that different religions would be unacceptable and freedom of speech wouldnt really be there. Hope this helps :)

Explanation:

alexgriva [62]3 years ago
3 0
It would be a crazy place I can tell you that
You might be interested in
What historical fact does the cartoon accurately foreshadow? (10 points)
jok3333 [9.3K]

That after becoming emperor, Napoleon would continue his attempts at conquest is the historical fact that cartoon accurately foreshadow.

<u>Explanation:</u>

  • The coronation of the napoleon was in an unnatural way that he himself crone directly in 1804 but after five years the french senate declared him as official emperor.  
  • In 1803 the Britain political release a cartoon about the Napolean Bonaparte demanding the crown with the tag line " crying for new toy " on 25 January.
  • His coronation was painted by Jacques Louis. During the Napolean period there was a serious french revolution and coalition with the British. He fought over 60 wars and only lost in 8 wars .

8 0
3 years ago
What was Marie curies citizenship later in life like?
Dovator [93]

Answer: Marie Skłodowska Curie (/ˈkjʊəri/ KEWR-ee;[3] French: [kyʁi]; Polish: [kʲiˈri]), born Maria Salomea Skłodowska (Polish: [ˈmarja salɔˈmɛa skwɔˈdɔfska]; 7 November 1867 – 4 July 1934), was a Polish and naturalized-French physicist and chemist who conducted pioneering research on radioactivity.

As part of the Curie family legacy of five Nobel Prizes, she was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize, the first person and the only woman to win the Nobel Prize twice, and the only person to win the Nobel Prize in two scientific fields. She was also the first woman to become a professor at the University of Paris.[4]

She was born in Warsaw, in what was then the Kingdom of Poland, part of the Russian Empire. She studied at Warsaw's clandestine Flying University and began her practical scientific training in Warsaw. In 1891, aged 24, she followed her elder sister Bronisława to study in Paris, where she earned her higher degrees and conducted her subsequent scientific work.

She shared the 1903 Nobel Prize in Physics with her husband Pierre Curie and physicist Henri Becquerel, for their pioneering work developing the theory of "radioactivity" (a term she coined).[5][6] Using techniques she invented for isolating radioactive isotopes, she won the 1911 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the discovery of two elements, polonium and radium.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Which best summarizes what Antony is trying to do in his speech?
svet-max [94.6K]

Answer:

c. Make the crowd see that Caesar was not a tyrant.

Explanation:

William Shakespeare's "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" revolves around the killing of Julius Caesar and the fight for the power of Rome among the leaders. The play deals with themes of loyalty, greed, power, government, good vs evil, appearance, and reality, etc.

Antony's speech at the funeral of Caesar was not done to openly criticize the murderers and conspirators. Instead, he termed them <em>"honorable men" </em>while his tone and expression say otherwise. He expresses his belief that Caesar was not a tyrant and <em>"over-ambitious"</em> like Brutus claimed. But rather, Caesar was one who deemed all of them as his family, as his <em>"heirs"</em>. Moreover, he points out that he (Caesar) denied the crown thrice, which is suggestive of his humility and not something that a tyrant would do.

Thus, the correct answer is option c.  

3 0
2 years ago
Why did people think socrats ideas were so important plz help
Troyanec [42]

Answer:

Explanation:

He Invented Philosophical Ethics

“What is the right way to live?” pondered Socrates. ... With it, he effectively created philosophical ethics – the debate between good and evil – which has shaped moral and legal codes throughout the Western world.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What statement best describes Mercutio’s opinion of Tybalt?
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

he is loyal and guguioonnb huùiibgsubsh

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are international organuzations? Why should the United States be a part of them?
    14·1 answer
  • After the War of 1812, the nation tried to?
    14·1 answer
  • What made immigration different in the time between 1860 and 1920 than in previous years?
    7·1 answer
  • Many jacks and lifts rely on what type of power to raise vehicles?
    12·2 answers
  • One way in which the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment were similar is that each
    12·1 answer
  • What was social economic and political life like in Europe in the Middle Ages
    9·1 answer
  • How did odysseus and the rest of his crew escape with their lives?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following was one of Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms
    5·1 answer
  • In what way did Aristotle improve the approach of other philosophers?<br>​
    11·1 answer
  • Who was the publisher of the newspaper the New
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!