I believe you have to search a URL of a website on the wayback machine search bar.
Then, you can browse the past-present years of how that website used to look like.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
$70,000
Explanation:
Under a Comparative negligence theory,
When an accident occurs, the blame or fault is determined by the contributions of each party towards the accident.
In a pure comparative negligence theory, the victim or plaintiff who files a case, sue the other party and received some part of the damages and hence each party receives the amount related to their damages minus the part of their fault.
In our case, Annette fault contributes 30% to the collision and determined that her total loss was $100,000.
So, Annette will recover:
= Total loss - 30% of fault
= $100,000 - 0.3 × $100,000
= $100,000 - $30,000
= $70,000
The attitude toward each other.
The correct answer is: Customer Match relies on your own data instead of a remarketing tag.
INTERPRETATION
If an advertiser doesn’t want to add remarketing tags to a website then Customer Match would be a good fit for them because Customer Match creates a similar audience for you by using the data from your ad accounts and campaigns. This makes the Customer Match data reliable because it uses your own data instead of a remarketing tag.
The Customer Match audience is created from the interests and behavior of the audience similar to your previous website visitors.
Therefore, we can conclude that the correct option is D. If an advertiser doesn’t want to add remarketing tags to a website then Customer Match would be a good fit for them because Customer Match relies on your own data instead of a remarketing tag.
Your question is incomplete, but most probably your full question was:
If an advertiser doesn't want to add remarketing tags to a website, why would Customer Match be a good fit for them?
a. Customer Match allows you to reach people who have been to your website
b. Customer Match allows you to reach people who haven’t been to your website yet
c. It wouldn’t be a good fit. You have to tag your website to use Customer Match
d. Customer Match relies on your own data instead of a remarketing tag
Learn more about Remarketing on:
brainly.com/question/27692394
#SPJ4
Answer: 83.53 days.
Explanation:
We would need to calculate the Current Assets as well as the Quick Assets.
Calculating the Current Assets we can use the Current ratio and Current Liabilities as follows,
Current Assets = Current Ratio * Current Liabilities
= 1.22 * 28,000
= $34,160
Then we calculate the Quick Assets which are essentially the most liquid assets being Cash and Cash Equivalents,
= Quick Ratio * Current Liabilities
= 0.71 * 28,000
= $19,880
Inventory will be Current Assets minus Quick Assets because Current Assets include all Current Assets whereas Quick Assets are Cash And Cash Equivalents Current Assets
= 34,160 - 19,880
= $14,280
We can then calculate the Inventory Turnover as,
= Cost of Goods sold / Inventory
= 62,400/14,280
= 4.36974789916 times.
Now we can finally calculate the days of Inventory by dividing the days in a year by the Turnover ratio. We will assume a 365 year.
= 365/4.36974789916
= 83.53 days.
It takes 83.53 days on average does it take to sell the inventory.
