1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SIZIF [17.4K]
3 years ago
6

What are the most convincing reasons for not prosecuting nixon

History
1 answer:
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The main reasons for not prosecuting Nixon would be to save the country further embarrassment and to prevent further division.  Our country was at a very low point then.  Drawing out the process would have only made things worse in the long run.

You might be interested in
What is a major function of the presidents cabinet members?
irina [24]

The correct answer is A. I’m positive

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did western farmers send products over the Appalachian Mountains instead of down the Mississippi River?
valentinak56 [21]

Spain refused to let Americans ship products down the river to New Orleans, under Spain’s control.


6 0
4 years ago
which statement reflects an argument of enlightenment philosophers against the belief in the divine right of kings
Citrus2011 [14]
"the power of the government is derived from the governed .John Locke believed in the right of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. He did not believe that kings had a divine right to rule, but that the people <span>of the country should choose their leader."

</span>"The Divine Rights of Kings was basically used before the Glorious Revolution. It allowed kings to be above the law; anything they say, goes. But when the Glorious Revolution came along in 1689, Parliament took power away from the king and they were no longer "above the law." They were expected to obey the law <span>just as everyone else"</span>
4 0
4 years ago
How did Saudi Arabia gain its independence?
Sholpan [36]

Answer: treaty of jetta :)

7 0
3 years ago
What does Paine say about the argument that Britain has defended the<br> colonies in the past?
olga2289 [7]
The British defended America, but their motivation wasn’t protection and safety for the colonists, it was for the British’s own gain. The British are actually at fault for the attacks on America by their enemies.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which types of laws does judasim uphold? 
    6·2 answers
  • What territory in south asia is claimed by both india and pakistan?
    13·1 answer
  • How did the new deal change the social, economic, and political landscape of the united states
    11·1 answer
  • What’s Whas the scramble for África?
    9·1 answer
  • What repeating themes or patterns are in the jim crow laws
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these crimes is a classified as a property crime?
    7·2 answers
  • How did the Industrial Revolution help develop imperialism?
    7·2 answers
  • Help, please thank you!
    6·2 answers
  • The attempts to free Jerusalem from Turkish control were called the:
    5·1 answer
  • What candy was given to soldiers in battle in the korean war
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!