Answer:
a. enforce the contract or recover what she invested with Finlay.
Explanation:
From the question we are informed about Frank which Through fraudulent means, he induces Ethel to sign a contract to invest with him the profits from her business. In this case When Ethel learns the truth, she may enforce the contract or recover what she invested with Frank. Contract can be regarded as an agreement that exist between two parties which could be private parties to create obligation which is mutual and is enforceable under law, element needed for a contract to be valid is that there must be valid offer as well as acceptance.
Answer:
32.03%
Explanation:
Data provided as per the question
Net operating income = $42,930
Average operating assets = $134,000
The computation of return on investment (ROI) is shown below:-
Return on investment =net operating income ÷ average operating assets
$42,930 ÷ $134,000
= 32.03%
Therefore for computing the return on investment we simply divide average operating assets by net operating income.
Answer:
yes, there is no separation between the administration and ownership in a partnership.
the partnership contract stipulates which partners have the decision making ability and which partners don't. We cannot say specifically that limited partners have no say in decision making.
Moreover, the control of the partnership is not based on the amount invested like in corporations. that too is based on the contract. however, in practice, yes if you have more money invested in the business, you have more influence.
Explanation:
The answer is explained in detail below
Explanation:



Labor, L = 2000; Capital, K = 3000
Labour constraint,
Capital constraint ,
Solving the equation further, we get


- The range for the relative price of cloth such that the economy produces both cloth and food is 2/3 and 2
- Low cloth production → economy will use relatively more labor to produce cloth → opportunity cost of cloth is 2/3rd units of food.
- High cloth production → economy dips on labor → taking capital away from food production → raising opportunity cost of cloth to 2 units of food.
- If relative price of cloth lies between 2/3 and 2 units of food, the economy produces both goods.
- If the price of cloth decreases below 2/3 → complete specialization in food production → low compensation for producing cloth
- If the price of cloth rises above 2 → complete specialization in cloth production → low compensation for producing food