The correct answer is B. I called for Sadie. Sadie didn't answer. I waited up for Sadie didn't come home.
Explanation:
Parallel constructions involve the repetition of a grammatical pattern including the use of the same tense or grammatical form to express elements of the same importance. This structure is used in the sentence "I called for Sadie. Sadie didn't answer. I waited up for Sadie didn't come home" because in this sentence all the actions are expressed using the simple past tense through verbs such as called, waited, or didn't answer. Moreover, this structure helps the author create a sad tone because all the actions expressed the idea Sadie cannot be found.
Answer:
Blanca Flor and Juanito will probably be reunited later in the story. After all Blanca does to help Juanito escape, it is likely that he will find help and return to the farm to save her. He would not leave her there to be punished after she saves him and helps him get free.
<span>I think
that this excerpt from chapter 23 of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn most
clearly illustrates that the duke is someone who does not take responsibility
for his actions and would rather blame
others if something does not go well:</span>
…Well, when
the place couldn't hold no more people the duke he give a fellow a quarter and
told him to tend door for him a minute, and then he started around for the
stage door, I after him; but the minute we turned the corner and was in the
dark he says:
«Walk fast
now till you get away from the houses, and then shin for the raft like the
dickens was after you!»….
Answer:
It is difficult to discern whether individuals can be designated as having good morals when an action is done not because it was moral, but because God has commanded it.
Explanation:
The idea of Theological Volunteerism is that an action has moral value because the action is approved or even recommended by God, through his teachings. In this context, what we as humans might consider as something that is morally right, may be considered in opposition to God's will or even deemed as irrelevant since it was not taught by God of certain religions as a morally right action that their follower should take.
A great example of this would be the idea of slaughtering some farm animals under the name of God for it to be consumed by the followers of the religion, even though it means that the method used to kill these animals is more inhumane. To the followers of the religion, this action is morally right since God has commanded it to be so; to those who aren't followers of the religion, it is a horrific and morally wrong action.
Can u pls show what the story is bc nothing is showing
