Answer:
B. Disagree because they have different values
Explanation:
According to my research on different economical perspectives, I can say that based on the information provided within the question these economists disagree because they have different values. They apparently believe or see the economy and aspects in different perspectives which is why they are disagreeing on what is considered as the greatest social evil.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Test.
Explanation:
A test is different from an experiment: Before performing a test, there is an expected result. The test is performed to show this result. In an experiment, the result is open. Very often, tests are performed as part of an experiment.
Answer:
C. Reduced prices of Sony televisions resulted in an increase in the quantity demanded.
Explanation:
Sony is a well known brand . What could explain a sudden double increase in sales while other brands' didn't is most likely a reduction in in prices of Sony products. It is a well known brand and they sell quality products which customers trust. Having a discounted price means they are offering a sale which customers would want to take advantage of.
Answer:
C. Acme Securities Inc. may charge a management fee if it registers in the State as an investment adviser and the charges are fair and reasonable
Explanation:
From the question we are informed about Acme Securities Inc. which s registered as a broker-dealer in the State of Utah under the Uniform Securities Act. Acme wishes to begin charging customers a fee for managing accounts on a discretionary basis.
in this case the statement that is TRUE is "Acme Securities Inc. may charge a management fee if it registers in the State as an investment adviser and the charges are fair and reasonable"
The Uniform Securities Act can be regarded as a model law set up as a starting point as far as state-level securities regulation is concerned. The law was put in place so that securities fraud can be dealt with at the state level and render assistance to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) so that enforcement and regulation hold firmly.
Answer:
Explanation:
I will give a basic hint to understanding this problem
Prevailing technique or what is best known as "Dominant Strategy" is an activity profile that is best for a specific player review of what different players are picking. for this situation there is no prevailing procedure for any player on the grounds that there is no single activity profile that expands the result for any player.
So we can say from this observations that the following is valid;
- A doesn't have a dominant strategy
- B doesn't have a dominant strategy
There are two Nash equilibria for this situation. Both the organizations are charging a low cost and both the organizations are charging a significant expense.
As such they can augment their benefit given what the adversary is doing.
I hope this explains the observation seen.
cheers I hope this helps