The point of view goes from a third person and is limited to the third person omniscient.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the chapter, Franz Kafka The meta morphis, towards the end, there is a shift that takes place. The shift is that the view of point goes from a third person limited to the third person omniscient.
Omniscient is the person who knows every thing. So the point of view remains limited to that person only because he knows every thing already.
I would...be the goddess of pain and suffering. Although that sounds negative, I could actually clear up a lot of junk in the world when you think about it. If I eliminated the pain of those that don't deserve it, or fix a certain life problem for someone, or a whole group of people, I could fix so much in the world. (That's just one idea, lol I can send you other ones or add more detail to this one if you'd want)
Answer:
When the sentence is already clear.
It sounds awkward to split the infinitive.
Too much information is inserted between the two parts of the infinitive.
Explanation:
Splitting an infinitive means to put words in between an infinitive. This grammatical construction occurs <u>when a word is put in between the particle "to" and a verb.</u>
Writers should avoid splitting an infinitive as much as possible. This is because it <u>may sound awkward in splitting the infinitive.</u> It can also lead to the inclusion of<u> too much unnecessary information in the sentence</u>. Moreover, it is unnecessary to split infinitives<u> when the sentence is already clear.</u>
Thus, the correct answers are the first, second, and fifth options.
