Answer:
They are congruent by SAS
Step-by-step explanation:
MQ=PN
The angles with markings also go together
The line right in the middle is the second side because of the reflexive property
A) His estimate is incorrect, since he has increased a figure to the amount that each employee would receive.
B) Rounded to the nearest dollar, each employee would receive $ 209.
Since a company has $ 6582 to give out in bonuses, and an amount is to be given out equally to each of the 32 employees, and A) a manager, Jake reasoned that since 32 goes into 64 twice, each employee will get about $ 2000 , to determine if his estimate is correct, and B) determine how much will each employee receive, rounded to the nearest whole dollar, the following calculations must be performed:
A)
- 2000 x 32 = 64000
- 200 x 32 = 6400
Therefore, his estimate is incorrect, since he has increased a figure to the amount that each employee would receive.
B)
Therefore, rounded to the nearest dollar, each employee would receive $ 209.
Learn more about maths in brainly.com/question/8865479
Which relation is also a function? {(2,0), (3,2), (2,3)} {(0,0), (3,0), (5,0)} {(3,1), (3,2), (3,3)} {(5,2), (5,4), (2,6)}
pychu [463]
Answer:
only{(0,0), (3,0), (5,0)} (the x axis)
Step-by-step explanation:
as all the others have more than one possible output y for a unique input x
i think the answer is -50 but im
not sure
Answer:
The probability that a part is good given that it passed the inspection machine is P=0.978.
Step-by-step explanation:
As the inspection machine detect and discard any part that is completely defective, only the good and partially defective parts passed this inspection.
Then, if we have:
Probability of being a good part P(G)=0.90
Probability of being a patially defective part P(P)=0.02
Probability of being a completely defective part P(D)=0.08.
Probability of passing the inspection machine = 1-P(D)=1-0.08=0.92
Then, the probability of having a good part, given that it passed the inspection machine is:
