1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Softa [21]
3 years ago
8

How did the Court's opinion in the Cherokee Nation case differ from Worcester?

History
2 answers:
mixas84 [53]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In Cherokee Nation, the Court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction (the power to hear a case) to review claims of an Indian nation within the United States. In Worcester, the Court ruled that only the United States, and not the individual states, had power to regulate or deal with the Indian nations.

Explanation:

chubhunter [2.5K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In Cherokee Nation, the Court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction (the power to hear a case) to review claims of an Indian nation within the United States. In Worcester, the Court ruled that only the United States, and not the individual states, had the power to regulate or deal with the Indian nations.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What does this passage suggest about the first government of the United States?
ser-zykov [4K]

The Founders created a high standard of responsibility by requiring nine states to agree.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help <br> I will give you 10 points
Zarrin [17]
L= legislative, J= judicial, E= executive
1.) L
2.)E
3.) E
4.)E
5.)L
6.)E
7.)J
8.)E
9.)E
10.)L
11.)L
12.)E
13.)L
14.)J
15.)L
4 0
3 years ago
What nations was caught behind the iron curtain
Alborosie
The Europan countries which were considered to be "behind the Iron Curtain" included: Poland,Estearn Germany, Czechoslovakia, Hungary,Yugoslavia, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania and the Soviet Union. Hope this helps
6 0
3 years ago
How did the U.S. Constitution solve a problem created by the Articles of Confederation?
docker41 [41]

Option A, it allowed for government to enforce laws and settle disputes is the right answer.

The colonies of the United States did not want to have a strong centralized government, because they did not want the government to become a tyranny. Hence, they did not even provide the national government with some very significant powers such as the power of issuing money, imposing taxes, enforcing laws etc.

Constitution fixed this problem by giving more power to the Federal government. The new government adopted the system of checks and Balances.This system was developed by the framers of the constitution to prevent the actions of the other branches from becoming powerful. Hence, all the three branches ( the Legislative, the Executive and the Judicially) of the system are induced to share power.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the main reason the Nazis killed millions of Jews in the Holocaust?
Igoryamba
The answer for this is C
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What services did Hull House and other settlement houses offer? Check all of the boxes that apply. Acculturation support Health
    15·2 answers
  • Suppose there is a country that suffered great losses during World War II. In its weakened state, it still hopes to resist commu
    13·2 answers
  • How did the Twenty-Sixth Amendment affect citizenship in the United States?
    12·1 answer
  • ---EDIT answer: john locke
    11·1 answer
  • As a result of punic wars
    10·1 answer
  • What are core beliefs of republicans
    11·1 answer
  • How does Sulka trick Numskull to get him into the well? Use two details from the story to support your answer
    6·1 answer
  • Who was involved in the suger act 1764
    8·1 answer
  • What was Johnson's viewpoint on social change?
    7·2 answers
  • Characteristics of appeasement ??????!!!!
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!