1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Softa [21]
3 years ago
8

How did the Court's opinion in the Cherokee Nation case differ from Worcester?

History
2 answers:
mixas84 [53]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In Cherokee Nation, the Court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction (the power to hear a case) to review claims of an Indian nation within the United States. In Worcester, the Court ruled that only the United States, and not the individual states, had power to regulate or deal with the Indian nations.

Explanation:

chubhunter [2.5K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In Cherokee Nation, the Court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction (the power to hear a case) to review claims of an Indian nation within the United States. In Worcester, the Court ruled that only the United States, and not the individual states, had the power to regulate or deal with the Indian nations.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Please help I will give brainliest!
Aliun [14]

Answer:

The defeat of Japan led to the division, with a Soviet-backed communist government in the north and a U.S.-backed democratic government in the south.

Explanation:

pretty sure its one hope this helps :)

8 0
3 years ago
What contradictions do you see in Columbus’ impressions of indigenous people?
creativ13 [48]
What is the answer choices?
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which expresses the main impact of westward expansion on African slaves in the 1800’s
Zanzabum

Answer: I think the answer is "It weakened attempts to abolish slavery."

8 0
2 years ago
The second english civil war was also called the
Olegator [25]
It was also known as the English civil war
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need an answer ASAP please!
NikAS [45]

They believed that the right to dissent was an important part of any governmental system.

Explanation:

Puritans are the people who intended the purification of the church of England. They wanted to stop the ceremony, liturgy and practices which were not specified in the scriptures. They were the first settlers in Plymouth. They consider Bible to be the supreme authority.

They intended to establish rule for social order based on the holy Gospel. puritans were not individualists and they considered church to be the center for all activities. They regarded education to be very important as every christian is expected to read and understand bible for a perfect living in the society.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did Adam Smith argue in favor of?
    7·2 answers
  • How did President Andrew Johnson's views on reconstruction differ from those of Congress?
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement is true about the federalist party?
    15·2 answers
  • Which is a true statement about economic growth in the North during and after the Civil War?
    15·1 answer
  • Create a timeline for Nelson Mandela
    12·1 answer
  • What form of city government merges executive and legislative function in a single Group
    11·1 answer
  • Fort Sumter is located off the coast of _____.
    13·2 answers
  • During the Han dynasty, why were merchants considered such a low class in the social structure?
    12·1 answer
  • What is one main characteristic of secondary sources intended for academics and students?
    6·2 answers
  • what are some facts about Cornelious Vanderbilt donating his largest steamship to the union navy during the civil war?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!