During the Paleolithic period (before 12,000 years ago), most archaeological sites seem to reflect the organization of societies into fewer than 100 people.
Paleolithic or Paleolithic or Paleolithic also called Paleolithic (from Greek Palacios - old, lithos - stone), was the original development of stone tools in the 99th century It is a prehistoric period characterized by The Paleolithic period covers the technological prehistory of mankind [1]. It dates back to the earliest known use of stone tools by humans. 3.3 million years ago to the end of the Pleistocene c. 11,650 calorie blood pressure.
The Paleolithic in Europe preceded the Mesolithic, but the dates of the transition differ geographically by thousands of years. [3] The Paleolithic period is characterized by the use of carved stone tools, but people of this period also used tools of wood and bone. Other organic products, such as leather and plant fibers, have been adapted for use as tools. However, due to rapid decomposition, these have not survived on a large scale
Learn more about the Paleolithic here
brainly.com/question/540822
#SPJ4
Hello!
If Stalin had did that , maybe USSR would be alive and stronger nowadays .
B ) Achieved better results and conserved resources .
Hugs !!
Answer:
James II and VII (14 October 1633O.S. – 16 September 1701[1]) was King of England and Ireland as James II and King of Scotland as James VII,[3] from 6 February 1685 until he was deposed in the Glorious Revolution of 1688. The last Roman Catholic monarch of England, Scotland and Ireland, his reign is now remembered primarily for struggles over religious tolerance. However, it also involved the principles of absolutism and divine right of kings and his deposition ended a century of political and civil strife by confirming the primacy of Parliament over the Crown.[4]
James inherited the thrones of England, Ireland and Scotland from his elder brother Charles II with widespread support in all three countries, largely based on the principle of divine right or birth.[5] Tolerance for his personal Catholicism did not apply to it in general and when the English and Scottish Parliaments refused to pass his measures, James attempted to impose them by decree; it was a political principle, rather than a religious one, that ultimately led to his removal.[6]
In June 1688, two events turned dissent into a crisis; the first on 10 June was the birth of James's son and heir James Francis Edward, threatening to create a Catholic dynasty and excluding his Protestant daughter Mary and her husband William of Orange. The second was the prosecution of the Seven Bishops for seditious libel; this was viewed as an assault on the Church of England and their acquittal on 30 June destroyed his political authority in England. Anti-Catholic riots in England and Scotland now made it seem only his removal as monarch could prevent a civil war.[7]
Representatives of the English political elite invited William to assume the English throne; after he landed in Brixham on 5 November 1688, James's army deserted and he went into exile in France on 23 December. In February 1689, Parliament held he had 'vacated' the English throne and installed William and Mary as joint monarchs, establishing the principle that sovereignty derived from Parliament, not birth. James landed in Ireland on 14 March 1689 in an attempt to recover his kingdoms but despite a simultaneous rising in Scotland, in April a Scottish Convention followed their English colleagues by ruling James had 'forfeited' the throne and offered it to William and Mary. After defeat at the Battle of the Boyne in July 1690, James returned to France where he spent the rest of his life in exile at Saint-Germain, protected by Louis XIV.
Explanation:
hope it helps
plz mark as brainliest
Correct answer choice is :
<h2>B) A desire for personal gain over the common good</h2><h2 /><h3>Explanation:</h3><h3 />
As Democracy in America published, Tocqueville thought that equality was the great state and social concept of his period, and he thought that the United States allowed the most superior model of equality in action. He cherished American individualism but suggested that a society of individuals can easily become atomized and paradoxically consistent when every citizen, being conformed to all the rest, is lost in the crowd.
