I'm not sure how to give you solid proof, like an equation or something, but you can see that out of the four coordinates, two of them have the y-value of 4 and two of them have the y-value of 2. Also, there is 1.5 in between each x-value that is paired with the same y-value... if that makes sense. So for (0.5, 2) and (3, 2), there is 1.5 in between 0.5 and 3. I hope this helps! Sorry it's a bit of a weird answer
27 inches ......... 3/8
x inches .............8/8
<h3>x = (27×8/8)/(3/8) = 27×8/3 = 216/3 = 72 inches (father)</h3>
Answer:
The answer is: y=2x−8
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: Add -8x to both sides.
8x−4y+−8x=32+−8x
−4y=−8x+32
Step 2: Divide both sides by -4.
−4y−4=−8x+32−4
y=2x−8
Answer:
B) 81π units²
General Formulas and Concepts:
<u>Pre-Algebra</u>
Order of Operations: BPEMDAS
- Brackets
- Parenthesis
- Exponents
- Multiplication
- Division
- Addition
- Subtraction
<u>Geometry</u>
Radius of a Circle Formula: r = d/2
Area of a Circle Formula: A = πr²
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Step 1: Define</u>
Diameter <em>d</em> = 18 units
<u>Step 2: Manipulate Variables</u>
Radius <em>r</em> = 18 units/2 = 9 units
<u>Step 3: Find Area</u>
- Substitute in <em>r</em> [Area of a Circle Formula]: A = π(9 units)²
- [Area] Evaluate exponents: A = π(81 units²)
- [Area] Multiply: A = 81π units²
Answer:
A. simpson's paradox
Step-by-step explanation:
The Simpson's paradox was named after Edward Simpson, the person who described this paradox for the first time in 1951. In this paradox, you find two contrary patterns. For example, a positive and a negative correlation, depending on how data is analyzed. The differences in the analyses are how data are grouped. This paradox is observed often in social researches. Most of the times, results are affected by the sample on each group or additional information related to the data.
