Answer:
This activity is based on the landmark Supreme Court case Texas v. Johnson.
Explanation:
This activity is based on the landmark Supreme Court case Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), which deals with First Amendment protection of flag burning as symbolic speech.
Answer:
No, the court would not have been so lenient with her.
Explanation:
Whether or not Carmela was passive in the situation or she was only guiding her father on how to go about the lawsuit, the court has every right and would have included her in the lawsuit with her father. This is so because her father and she would have been included in the lawsuit in default. Hence, it is not a matter of decency or not, but a matter of what is supposed to be.
<span>The verbal message will likely take a backseat to the gestures and non-verbal cues. Higher-context communicators typically work with gestures moreso than the actual content that they're trying to communicate, while the opposite is usually true for those with a lower context style.</span>