Answer:
Historical skills help us build a historical overview of American socio-political and economic aspects which improves our present and the future.
Explanation:
By using the historical skills people tend to determine the change by comparing positions and historical figures in the past with the presence of American society and helps society to learn from its past to improve its future. For example, when we study the historical context of American revolution we understand the democratic ideals that have led the revolution possible and integrated thirteen colonies together and it fosters unity among the Americans in the modern era.
The correct answer is A. Organizing Roman history into 3 main eras
Explanation:
Periodization in history refers to the process of studying and categorizing events of the past in to block of time. This process is aimed at facilitating the analysis of historical events and understanding the causes of specific historical processes. Additionally, periodization is useful as blocks of time are organized according to relatively common characteristics. Considering periodization is applied when categorizing or organizing events of the past, it can be applied to Roman history which result could be 3 main eras with common historical features. Thus, periodization is useful in the case of organizing Roman History.
The answer is C. The<em> basic education</em> provided by the colonists had as primary purpose to help the Protestant children to learn <em>how to read</em>, so they could <em>read the scriptures and all the teachings in the Bible</em>. But any further education was rare, and the girls only learned writing and arithmetic, besides reading. They boys usually received more education.
REGRESSIVE ... lower income
So the full sentence would read: <span>With a regressive, the tax rate decreases as income increases. Lower income individuals bear a greater burden with this type of tax.
An example of a regressive tax would be a sales tax on everyday items. Lower income individuals must spent a higher percentage of their income on basic necessities, so sales taxes on necessary items takes from them a higher percentage of their income than is the case for wealthy individuals. If there are higher rates of tax on luxury items (like yachts or luxury cars) that are purchased only by higher-income people, that would not be regressive. But otherwise sales taxes affect a greater percentage of the poor's income than the rich.
Another example (and another consumption tax) would be taxes on gasoline. Think of two commuters who both drive 30 miles a day to get to work, in cars that get similar gas mileage. If one of those persons makes $100,000 a year, and the other person has a job that earns only $25,000 a year, the person earning $25,000 a year is paying the same amount in gas taxes as the person making $100,000 a year. That's a regressive tax.
[A detail to note: Americans on average across the country pay about 50 cents in taxes that is included in the price of each gallon of gas purchased.]</span>
I am pretty sure its B. Cuneiform but I am not 100%
