The formula for volume is l x w x h.
To find the missing link, we do the equation backwards.
l x 2.5 x 5 = 75
If we divide 75 by 5 then by 2.5, we get 6 which becomes our length.
To check, do 5 x 2.5 x 6 which should equal 75
6 is your length
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol
which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.
The equation of a line is given by y = mx + c; where m is the slope.
The given equation is 9 - x = 2y
y = -1/2 x + 9/2
Therefore, the slope is -1/2 and the y-intercept is 9/2.
Answer:
y ≈ 32.0°
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the triangle is right use the sine ratio to find y
sin y =
=
, thus
y =
(
) ≈ 32.0° ( nearest tenth )