Answer:
Can you provide the speech please?
Explanation:
Answer:
Question 2 would be It tells you that the author has great talent because she writes good stories for children as well as adults. Question 3 would be "Bountiful Brilliant Blume". Question 4 would be Judy Blume has been a very busy and gifted writer. (implicit). Question 5 would be a superbird saves the world. And question 6 would be a bird with super powers.
Explanation:
I hope this helps.
The characters mentioned in the question belong to the play "A Doll's House" by Henrik Ibsen.
<h3>
Use the drop-down menus to select the character that best completes each sentence. </h3>
- Threatens to reveal Nora's indiscretions - Krogstad
- Does not trust Nora and thinks that she cannot act responsibly- Helmer
- Has been a longtime friend of Nora's - Mrs. Linde.
- Acts silly but is a lot more resourceful than some think- Nora
<h3>
Characters of the story is:</h3>
Nora: is hitched to Torvald Helmer. Has been treated as a toy, a doll, for what seems like forever, continually being determined what to do, first by her dad and afterward by her better half.
Director: Nora's better half. Chauvinist and oblivious. Considers himself to be Nora's friend in need and expert. Regards Nora as though she were mediocre and unequipped for having an independent perspective.
Krogstad: works at a similar bank as Helmer. Is familiar with Nora's wrongdoing. Takes steps to uncover her insider facts to her better half. Has been enamored with Mrs. Linde previously.
Mrs. Linde: a widow, companions with Nora for quite a while. Reunites with Krogstad subsequent to promising to help Nora.
For more information about A Doll's House, refer the following link:
brainly.com/question/16754852
The correct answer is D. How I just took the quiz and got it right.
Good Luck!!!
Answer:
The CROWN (Create a Respectful and Open Workplace for Natural Hair) is a law passed in California. It forbids any kind of discrimination based on hair. As California is the first state to prohibit this kind of discrimination, its advocates claim that this law is necessary, as women with curly hair are often discriminated against.
It could be argued that all U.S. states should pass this law. Unfortunately, discrimination is present on all society levels - regardless of whether it is racial, gender or hairstyle discrimination. Although this kind of law might seem absurd to some people, the fact is that any law that could prevent further discrimination should be passed. At least, passing this law would shed light on the problem that people with unusual hairstyles face on a daily basis.
