Answer:
Summary Of Rethinking The Wild By Christopher Solomon Essay
1530 Words7 Pages
Humanity co-exists with nature in a relationship that periodically shifts between symbiotic and parasitic. We maintain this relationship in order to survive. In exchange, we carefully monitor how our behavior alters the natural environment and affects those living within it. This responsibility is the price we pay for our species’ sentience and dominance. To help fulfill our duty, America established the 1954 Wilderness Act in hopes of becoming passive “guardians” of nature instead of encroaching “gardeners.” However, the Wilderness Act has failed. In his article, “Rethinking the Wild”, Christopher Solomon questions the effectiveness of the law and correctly concludes that, after fifty years of dormancy, mankind must take an active role in environmental protection, the role of the gardener. Though critics may argue that the passivity of the “guardian” should be maintained, realistically, little can be done to preserve the environment when we refuse to do anything. Because mankind has a greater stake in the wilderness than we realize, we must assume a proactive role in protecting the wilderness out of respect for nature and our own ethical standards.
Boundaries and Investments
Assume for the sake of our argument that nature holds no intrinsic value. Why, then, is the wilderness worth protecting? Truthfully, the wilderness can be a valuable indicator of the planet’s overall health, which is not easily gauged in industrialized and populated areas due to human influence.
Yes, the phrase is a sentence fragment. It doesn’t make a complete sentence while standing alone. It’s not a full sentence.
It’s hard to see because I could never imagine being in that certain situation, it seems so scary, but as long as the baby is loved and cared for it doesn’t matter the age of the parents
The answer is A. Gets her mother to allow her to play in local tournaments.
There are four main styles of communication. I include a short description in each of them:
- passive: let others take the decisions for you: not express feelings or needs, ignoring your personal rights. Ex: "<em>I’m okay with whatever you want to do".</em>
- aggressive: defensive or hostile behaviour, ignoring others, personal benefits. Ex: "<em>this is what we’re doing." ( no option to change it)</em>
- passive-aggressive: being subtle, appearing passive but influencing others with sarcasm and irony, avoiding conversation. Ex: <em>attittudes such as spreading rumours, sabotaging other people's efforts.</em>
- assertive: direct, honest communication, respecting the feeling, ideas of others. Ex: <em>"I need for you to do.... because I feel..."</em>
In general, it is said that ASSERTIVE COMMUNICATION is the best in order to hold a respectful and long-term relationship, but it depends on the situations we encounter, the type of communication we use.
