- The correct answer is D. Substantive due process. The reason is simple, by passing the law, Congress has facilitated the compliance of federal authorities with the principle of procedural due process (the principle that if the government is going to deprive a person of life, liberty and/or property they have to follow the proper procedures as per the laws and the Constitution). Normally, the Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable search and seizure. However by passing this law Congress has bypassed such protections by stating that searching the home of anyone suspected of terrorism without a warrant is valid under the new law. However, the principle of Substantive Due process is clear: the fact that procedural due process was respected under the new laws does not prevent such law from being unconstitutional as it violates the Fourth amendment.
Democracies are pretty popular amongst Latin American countries. <span />
First, American troops would drive
Mexican forces out of the disputed border
region in Texas and make the border
secure. Then, the U.S. would
seize New Mexico and California. Finally,
American forces would take Mexico City,
<span>the capital of Mexico.
I put the final step in bold :) Hope this helps
</span>
Wow this is a strong message noonewillhavrgrape
