Answer:
Increase; not change
Explanation:
If the minimum wages tend to exceed the market clearing wages which is the wages in which the supply of labour equal to the demand for labour the labour supply will increased and the numbers of unemployed workers will definitely INCREASED while the number of the already employed workers will NOT CHANGE it will remain the same because the supply of labour did not equal the demand for labour since the minimum wages has exceeded the market clearing wages.
The numbers of supply has increased leading to the numbers of unemployed workers to increased because their is supply but no demand.
Therefore increased in supply of labour = increased in unemployed workers.
Answer:
There is no chance that a child of one parent who carries CF gene is born having Cystic Fibrosis if the other parent does not carry the CF gene.
Explanation:
Second child born to Chloe’s mother and stepfather will have Cystic Fibrosis only if they inherit one CF gene from each parent. Since stepfather is not carrier of CF gene, development of the disease at child is not possible.
A person who has inherited one CF gene from his/her parent will be a CF gene carrier, but will never develop Cystic Fibrosis. However as he/she a carrier of the CF gene, they can pass it on to their own child.
This is called infantile amnesia, also known as childhood amnesia.
Amnesia, as you already know, refers to the failure to remember things that happened, or people around you, or sometimes, in very severe cases, who you are. When it comes to infantile amnesia, however, it means that the child does not remember its earliest years.
In which defense do defendants affirm that they have reasonable grounds to believe that certain statements had no omission of material facts; Due diligence defense.
Any defendant except the issuer can assert this defense and it requires that the defendant demonstrate that she investigated the registration announcement and had reasonable grounds to believe that the registration statement become accurate and had no omission of material facts.
section 11 of the Securities Act imposes liability for underwriters, directors, and others involved with public security offerings. The statute also provides a due diligence defense for everyone, except the issuer.
Learn more about Due diligence defense here brainly.com/question/16036251
#SPJ4
Answer:
In my opinion it should be Governance.
Explanation
Hope that helped its the most reasonable answer too me.
