This question is to complex. In Order for this to be answerable you would need to put it into chunks
Answer: $42,400
Explanation:
The family currently spends $40,000 on living expenses.
Inflation is expected to be 6% and as Inflation is used to refer to the general rise in prices, this means that the family will be spending 6% more in one year.
They will therefore be spending;
= 40,000 * (1 + 6%)
= $42,400
Answer:
Total current liabilities 85.008,33
Explanation:
current liabilities: obligations that will setlte within a one-year period
<em />
<em>accounts payable</em> from the purchase of equipment:
cost: 176,500
paid: <u> (125,900) </u>
balance: 50,600
<em />
<em>waranty liaiblity:</em>
191,000 x 5% = 9,550
<em>sales tax payable:</em>
sales for 191,000
paid for <u> (141,000) </u>
unpaid for 50,000 x 6% = 3,000
<em>note payable</em> with a local bank:
principal: 21,500
accrued interest: 21,500 x 5% x 1/3 = 358,33
net: 21,858.33
<u>Total current liabilities:</u>
accounts payables 50,600
warrant liability: 9,550
sales tax payable: 3,000
note payable: <u> 21,858.33 </u>
85.008,33
With face value equal to $ 1000, present value equal to $ 1,065, we get nper = 16.5 * 2 = 33. Rate(ytm) is equal to 7.7%/2 = 3.85%.PMT (coupon payment) = $ 42.01.Coupon rate = (42.01 / 1000) = 4.20%.Therefore, the annual coupon rate is equal to 4.2 * 2 which equates to 8.40%
The new ordinance will make a difference when the new wages will be binding.
<h3>How to depict the information?</h3>
It should be noted that the supply curve shows the relationship between the price and the quantity supplied.
Based on the information given, when the equilibrium wage is above the minimum wage, the ordinance won't make a difference.
On the other hand, when the equilibrium wage is below the minimum wage, it'll make a difference for the worker.
Therefore, joining the lowest of the two points will give the equilibrium.
Learn more about supply curve on:
brainly.com/question/26430220
#SPJ11
