Answer:
Positive statement is defined as the statement which are fact based and tells us the reality and these statements can be tested, amended or rejected on behalf of the evidence.
Normative statement is defined as the statements which includes suggestions or opinions that can be tested by observing the evidence. These are the subjective statements.
(a) Positive statement
(b) Normative Statement
(c) Normative Statement
(d) Positive statement
(e) Positive statement
(f) Normative statement
Answer:
The opportunity cost of the event $21.
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the loss of alternative when someone chooses an alternative.
Number of Hours = 3 hours
Earning per hour = $7
Total opportunity cost = $7 x 3
Total opportunity cost = $21
As Max has to bear the loss of $21 earning when he goes to the event in the museum. So this is his opportunity cost.
Original Source Material
Student Version
Merck, in fact, epitomizes the ideological nature--the pragmatic idealism--of highly visionary companies. Our research showed that a fundamental element in the "ticking clock" of a visionary company is a core ideology--core values and a sense of purpose beyond just making money--that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Several factors can contribute to long-term organizational success. One is the establishment of a core ideology that Collins and Porras (2002) describe as "core values and sense of purpose beyond just making money" (p. 48). Also, the importance of a visionary leader that guides and inspires people throughout the organization and remains relatively fixed for long periods of time is hard to over emphasize.
References:
Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.
Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?
Word-for-Word plagiarism
Paraphrasing plagiarism
This is not plagiarism
This is not plagiarism.
Answer: Option 3.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Plagiarism in very simple words is the copying of the content of the document that has been written by some one else in to your own document. During this copying the due acknowledgement is also not given to the document from which it has been taken.
The document that has been talked about in the question above is not an example of plagiarism. The proof for this is the due acknowledgement given to the references from whose document the content has been taken into the document.
Answer:
Evidence based.
Explanation:
Evidence: It is something that furnishes proof or testimony or something legally submitted to ascertain in the truth of matter.
Evidence basedis the conscientious (effort), explicit (clarity) and judicious (critical of quality) use of the best available evidence from multiple sources to increase the likelihood of a favourable outcome.
Characteristics:
- It’s about the process
- It’s not about certainties (this will work)
- It’s is about probabilities and likelihoods
- It is about reducing uncertainty (given our context this is more likely to lead to the outcome we want than doing something else or doing nothing)
